Quote Originally Posted by King Henry V
He was excellent in manoeuvring troops both on and off the battle field. The campaign which led to the Capitulation of Ulm in 1805 was waged with hardly a battle fought.
This thread has got me thinking , oh no! What do you guys think
about Napolean having the best scouting/recon/map-reading&making/
engineer types since he always seemed to get 'there' in fine fashion, along
with having the best artillery set up and ready to go in most cases? Always amazing to me the amount of men involved and the
number of artillery/cavalry that were on the battlefield and how they got
'there' .