Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: conquering without attacking??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Yesdachi swallowed by Jaguar! Member yesdachi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,454

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by bretwalda
    Easy: Drag one of your assassins over the desired king. If the message where you can choose yes/no says that a heir will take over then there is at least one heir; if it says there is no heir: that's your lucky day...
    What a great way to check if there are heirs!

    As for your Q about what level I play, always expert, unless I am trying something new.
    (The way I figure it, I have ruled thru hundreds of kings if I am not at expert level yet then I shouldn’t be playing. Some days I shouldn’t be playing .)
    Peace in Europe will never stay, because I play Medieval II Total War every day. ~YesDachi

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Graphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Nevada, U.S.
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    I have another idea about the thread starter's issue.

    Do blood links between empires last even when the alliance is broken? Not neccissarily to war, but neutral? Perhaps some people he married into in the past cancelled alliances over something but the link remained.

  3. #3
    Sports Freak Member dgfred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.C., USA
    Posts
    511

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by yesdachi
    What a great way to check if there are heirs!

    As for your Q about what level I play, always expert, unless I am trying something new.
    (The way I figure it, I have ruled thru hundreds of kings if I am not at expert level yet then I shouldn’t be playing. Some days I shouldn’t be playing .)
    Yes it is a nice check!

    I also play expert, and I am also continually suprised by the game



    and pissed off , not really.... just .
    PB-PL Commander/CC2 Commander/MTW Commander

  4. #4
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by dgfred
    I also play expert, and I am also continually suprised by the game



    and pissed off , not really.... just .

    I take it the AI has kicked your butt a few times?
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

  5. #5
    Sports Freak Member dgfred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.C., USA
    Posts
    511

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by Martok
    I take it the AI has kicked your butt a few times?

    The really big surprises: massive early civil/rebel wars, a couple of viking
    units slaughtering an army three times its size, GA points not working for
    Crusades, stuff like that= I started over . And many games
    I have auto-loaded after a major boo-boo or Crusade pt testing .
    PB-PL Commander/CC2 Commander/MTW Commander

  6. #6
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by dgfred
    The really big surprises: massive early civil/rebel wars, a couple of viking
    units slaughtering an army three times its size, GA points not working for
    Crusades, stuff like that= I started over . And many games
    I have auto-loaded after a major boo-boo or Crusade pt testing .

    Out of curioisity, what faction are/were you playing as? (I'm guessing the Germans, since they can crusade and are one of the factions most likely to run into Vikings early on.)
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

  7. #7
    Sports Freak Member dgfred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.C., USA
    Posts
    511

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by Martok
    Out of curioisity, what faction are/were you playing as? (I'm guessing the Germans, since they can crusade and are one of the factions most likely to run into Vikings early on.)
    You know it , My current HRE game I have one smallish army made up of
    all 'Friedrichs' units
    PB-PL Commander/CC2 Commander/MTW Commander

  8. #8
    Minion of Zoltan Member Roark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    961

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Yeah, the Germans also win the prize for "Most Likely to Incur Civil War"....

  9. #9
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: conquering without attacking??

    Quote Originally Posted by dgfred
    You know it , My current HRE game I have one smallish army made up of
    all 'Friedrichs' units

    You know, if you keep doing that, I think your emperor should at least get the Nepotism trait.



    Quote Originally Posted by Roark
    Yeah, the Germans also win the prize for "Most Likely to Incur Civil War"....

    .....followed close behind by the French. Incidentally, I would also rank these two factions as #1 and #2 on the list "Most Likely to be Excommunicated". Personally, I don't think that's a coincidence.
    Last edited by Martok; 09-05-2005 at 09:07.
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO