Results 1 to 30 of 50

Thread: Attack (or defend) the science

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member The Black Ship's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Tampa, Fl.     USA
    Posts
    1,771

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    Quote Originally Posted by AdrianII
    Why don't you join in the effort to find out? I am an ageing stamp collector, but you, The Black Ship, supposing that you are as young and smart as you sound, can try your hand at physics and make it your business to explore and investigate such fundamental questions.
    Funny you mention it, I try my hand at physics every day. I work in the Medical Physics department at a Cancer center. When I enter the desired monitor unit into the linear accelerator I expect a certain outcome. If that outcome doesn't occur, I attempt to find out why.

    Doesn't explain how something came from nothing though...the accelerator won't run without power, try as I might, but I can explain certain actions, causes, and can investigate. But that doesn't get science off the hook for my original question.

    Where did the power come from at the beginning of time? Of course, if you believe it was provided by God, then I'd also have to ask "was there a time before God? And if so, how did he (something) come from nothing"?
    All we are saying....is give peas a chance - Jolly Green Giant

  2. #2
    Member Member bmolsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    Religion and science is not in contradiction to each other. Science is a tool, which is used to try to explain phenomena and to use as a basis for development and evolution of our collected knowledge.
    The largest problem with modern science is that it is often used for the good of individuals. Scientific work has many times taken the shape religion has and is nothing more than a political tool to push a specific agenda forward. More direction is needed.....

  3. #3
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    Actually more politicians with a science degree is needed rather then the 1% or so who do...
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

  4. #4
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    does anyone know how many politicians are doctors (medical or other scientific fields) and where they reside in the political spectrum?
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  5. #5
    "'elp! I'm bein' repressed!" Senior Member Aenlic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The live music capital of the world.
    Posts
    1,583

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff
    does anyone know how many politicians are doctors (medical or other scientific fields) and where they reside in the political spectrum?
    Well, I looked; because I'm curious as well. Sadly, I can't find any site which had the information in easy to get form. I did find that 3 members of the current U.S. Congress are medical doctors, all three Republicans. I don't have the patience to go through the biographies of each of the other 432 members to determine their educational background. I'd be willing to bet that most of them are lawyers, though.
    "Dee dee dee!" - Annoymous (the "differently challenged" and much funnier twin of Anonymous)

  6. #6
    Actual Person Member Paul Peru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Yurp
    Posts
    529

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    My theses on science:
    1. Science sux!
    2. Science is just a lot of guys (and a few gals) in white, massaging their egos and publishing stuff that they hope noone understands, because it's certainly of no use to man nor beast.
    3. Science is in the pocket of Big Business Capital Corporation Multinational Money-men. Science these days doesn't care about gaining understanding of the world or improving quality of life for common people, just ways to squeeze money out of the many and dump it on the few.

    There has recently been a major breakthrough in Norwegian stamps: You can now buy a stamp that says something like "normal letter type thing, priority" Instead of "6 kroner", so next year when you finally want to snail-mail a few words to your disconnected friend, it's still valid!
    Sono Pazzi Questi Romani
    Paul Peru: Holier than thy bucket!

  7. #7
    Hǫrðar Member Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hordaland, Norway
    Posts
    6,449

    Default Re: Attack (or defend) the science

    Why on Earth should I attack science? Science is what makes the world move forward.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Peru
    1. Science sux!
    Without science the world wouldn`t have developed further, and we`d been stuck in the stone age.
    Last edited by Viking; 09-06-2005 at 18:43.
    Runes for good luck:

    [1 - exp(i*2π)]^-1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO