Thoughts?
I thought this was a good game. It was not historically accurate, but it had some good gameplay...
Thoughts?
I thought this was a good game. It was not historically accurate, but it had some good gameplay...
It's ok, the future era's are the best. Cause you have giant mechs to blast the sh*t out of what ever looks at you cock-eyed. The x-pack with space battles (EE1) was the best of all. Japanese cyber-ninjas what's not to love.![]()
If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.
VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI
I came, I saw, I kicked ass
Ugh. RTS fare, and not great RTS at that.
This game was amazing when it was first released, the graphics were good, the gameplay was great, and the level editor was the best in any RTS game.
But all of this was pushed aside imo, when Empires: Dawn of the Modern World was released. Now this game was amazing and once again the map/level editor was the easiest and best in any RTS game.
The game was totally unmatched until Rome: Total War came out that is.
But Empire Earth imo: 85%
I haven't really tried the Empire Dawn of the Modern World editor, but I'm fairly sure W3 editor is like *way* more effective and better.
And EE was great, and is still a great multiplayer game (although have to agree that the last era were kinda sucky). Of course, it's not historically accurate, but who cares ?
yeah I liked it , my favorite era's were the Roman , and the WWII , wasn't to crazy about the ''Nano'' ages though.
And I liked the EE better than it's expansion
![]()
Bookmarks