Again you would be incorrect all one has to do is look at the definitionsOriginally Posted by bmolsson
Originally Posted by websters for retribution
So in essence punishment is indeed primarily about retibution by its definition.Originally Posted by Websters for punishment
These are not punishment catergories - these are side-effects of punishment in the justice system.You can divide in punishment in 3 categories:
1. Prevention (thanks for the word, by the way).
A law is there for a reason. The punishment for breaking this law should be so costly that it prevents people breaking it. Very much like military balance actually.
2. Protection.
Some crimes require the society to be protected from the individual, therefore the punishment has to remove the individual from the society, hence protecting it from his actions.
You are correct retribution does contain morals - morals are very much intertwined (SP) with justice and punishment. The desire not to discuss morals leaves most arguements about punishment only half complete.3. Retribution
This is the moral part. Some would argue that "re-education" is better than revenge. I believe that this portion is always the one that is under hefty discussions. Bottomline is that you want to satisfy the victim and teach the criminal, in what ever order that works for you. For the society itself it's irrelevant as long as 1 and 2 are fulfilled.
I think that its important to identify the society here. Its a powerstructure with the purpose to organise and standardize a group of individuals. The main objectives of the society are more important than the individuals and therefore there are many times disagreements which has to be enforced.
Bookmarks