Results 1 to 30 of 55

Thread: Objectionable links

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: Objectionable links

    Quote Originally Posted by Divinus Arma
    TosaInu and his GooseStepping Compatriots are very much IN THE RIGHT.
    I beg your pardon! I have never stepped on a goose in my life.

    However I did kick a chipmunk once...
    Unto each good man a good dog

  2. #2
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: Objectionable links

    There is a logistical problem with 18+ forum... proof of age... how do we do it... credit card checks?

    Then we also probably run into legal hassles if we don't get it right... one 13 year old looking at 18+ material and then wham a lawsuit...
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

  3. #3
    Pining for the glory days... Member lancelot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Land of Hope & Glory
    Posts
    1,198

    Default Re: Objectionable links

    Quote Originally Posted by Papewaio
    There is a logistical problem with 18+ forum... proof of age... how do we do it... credit card checks?

    Then we also probably run into legal hassles if we don't get it right... one 13 year old looking at 18+ material and then wham a lawsuit...
    Well, I dont see that as a problem really.

    For example, RTW is a teen+ game, yet it is entierly possible that a pre-teen(who technically, has no business being on a site for a teen+ game) can come here and look around) There is no restrictions for this scenario, yet the principle is the same.

    Perhaps some sort of disclaimer warning persons of content would be enough, you see such things on many sites...
    "England expects that every man will do his duty" Lord Nelson

    "Extinction to all traitors" Megatron

    "Lisa, if the Bible has taught us nothing else, and it hasn't, it's that girls should stick to girls sports, such as hot oil wrestling and foxy boxing and such and such." Homer Simpson

  4. #4
    Toh-GAH-koo-reh Member Togakure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Zen Garden
    Posts
    2,740

    Default Re: Objectionable links

    There are so many places to go on the net where people can look at or discuss 18+ stuff ... why does it have to be included here? It is so easy to throw up a site or forum these days ... if people want to be vulgar and swear constantly, why not just put up their own site instead of requesting to lower the standards here?

    You go to school, you adapt to the school way of things; you go to the pub, you adapt to the pub way; you go home to mama, you adapt to mama's way of doing things. You come to the Org ... .

    As it stands, my interest in this site hangs by a thread (thrilling news to some, yes? Well ... bite this!). The sense of friendship, knowledge share, and focus on fun and growth in TW games has diminished significantly since I first came to this site. Now we have so many more little cliques, staff spend more time policing and scolding and rule-making than they do welcoming and sharing, helping and encouraging, and the most regular dialog seems to take place outside of the TW subject matter, often contentious and of little value.

    Frankly, I think this site's scope has broadened enough; further diversification in content will shift this site's audience away from TW games towards more ... what? I think the current focus and standard of "decency" (for the lack of a better term) should be maintained. I think many patrons and staff would do well to balance online activities with enriching activities offline. Being gone for a couple of months and diving back into life now has me wondering why in the hell I spent so much time and took things so seriously here in the past, and why many here seem to do the same.

    My Yen's worth.
    Be intent on loyalty
    While others aspire to perform meritorious services
    Concentrate on purity of intent
    While those around you are beset by egoism


    misc kanryodo

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO