You want the US government to charge corporations for protecting patented intellectual property?

If a company relocates it's design and manufacturing overseas, that's less income tax the US receives and more that the foreign countries receive. Unless the CEO & the rest of the board are moving to New Delhi themselves, any money they wring out of that relocation is still going to be taxed while they're living large in their upper East Side penthouse. In doing this, tax policy is more direct and the effects (and therefore the merits) of the current taxation/spending programs are easily observable. Either corporate leaders think they're getting a good bang for their buck, and they take their income while living here and pay their taxes or they don't, and they relocate.

The situation you describe, where a corporation receives services when it's not paying taxes doesn't happen with individual tax payers. If Lee R. Raymond, CEO of Exxon Mobile decides he doesn't want to pay American taxes and moves to Shanghai, there's not much he can do to force the US to provide him with public services over there.