Will you two get a room?

Was there any honour in fighting for the Nazi Germany warmachine? Consider that over 50 million people died in WWII.
Most of them didn't fight for the Nazi's but for their country, their family and their friends and there must be honour in fighting for those things otherwise there can be no honour in any self-sacrifice.

Were the German soldiers more heroic then the Allies? How? Consider that they fought both for the Nazis and the Losing side.
What has this got to do with heroism? By your measure there would be no heroes unless there side won and you agreed with their cause.

No, but there were more heroic German soldiers simply because Germans had many more infantry engagements than the allies. Consider the fighting conditions of the average German soldier in Russia to that of the Tommy in France.. who had more bravery facing the enemy?
Lol, there's a sweeping generalisation if ever I saw one. If the Germans had more infantry engagements than the Allies who were they fighting?

As for the medals I would say that they did water down the selection procedure and this inevitably cheapens the medals that were earned by pure merit, but this does not mean that the one's who actually earned them are less brave than allied soldiers.

Are you suggesting that there were equal numbers of brave soldiers on both sides? Where are your facts to back this up?

8000 Germans performed exceedingly bravely and 400 Americans did.

The next logical step to your implication is that the Knights Cross could only be as high an award if only 400 Germans got it. That defies intelligence.
Here I am forgetting that the US won the war all by themselves.

The idea that one side is inherently braver than the other is ridiculous as is the implication that the losing, or "wrong", side has no honour or bravery. Maybe you should both take the blinkers off and see that both sides carried out great, and terrible, deeds and both showed bravery and honour at times, either that or take it to PM's.