NOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooo

**Revolting Friendship** · 09-24-2005, 23:18

BobTheTerrible:

That's a remarkably good point. The only reason I laughed is because somewhere deep down inside of me, I'm still expecting CA to be historically correct, but I wasn't lying when I said I can't wait to get my hands on BI, I'll just have to take it for what it is, which will be fine, as long as they improve the AI and some other major issues.

Besides, it will probably be a good base for further mod-building. Probably.... Hopefully...

And who doesn't want to make a driveby on a unit of priests with chariot ballistae? Honestly guys.

**tk-421** · 09-24-2005, 23:57

Originally Posted by TomteOfDoom

And who doesn't want to make a driveby on a unit of priests with chariot ballistae? Honestly guys.

I don't.

**Krusader** · 09-24-2005, 23:59

The chariot ballistae had to be stationary to fire as I recall someone telling me. Still prefer Horse Archer driveby

**Reverend Joe** · 09-25-2005, 01:38

The frustrating thing is that they are selling this game as at least partially historically accurate. But these knights are not in the least bit accurate- not any more than war dogs.

**Fenrhyl** · 09-25-2005, 02:10

I am not expecting CA to deliver an historically accurate game, i expect them to deliver a game that is fun to play. Historical accuracy can be achieved by modding the game, and so it's done by the fans.

CA just can't stand the ground of historical accuracy with the moders, so why blaming them for going nuts and proposing this kind of stuff ? They don't put a sticker on the box claiming "historical accuracy inside" as far as i know, so what is the problem ?

**Reverend Joe** · 09-25-2005, 02:15

Originally Posted by Fenrhyl

They don't put a sticker on the box claiming "historical accuracy inside" as far as i know, so what is the problem ?

From what I have seen, they do everything BUT that. Or maybe it's just me.

**Zero1** · 09-25-2005, 02:16

I personally don't have a problem with CA, other then their claim that they "create a historical approximation of a starting point" when they don't even do that. That and their horrificaly negative attitude towards the modding community, that and their utterly stone deaf approach to any and all criticism.

I mean, blaming mods for the save/reload bug when it was a problem long before mods shows a baffling lack of touch with their player community.