You certainly do not need it to build a fission reactor, but you need it to understand how species are grouped into philum, genus and such.I mean the teaching of it? Do we really need to be taught Darwinism to build a fission reactor?
You certainly do not need it to build a fission reactor, but you need it to understand how species are grouped into philum, genus and such.I mean the teaching of it? Do we really need to be taught Darwinism to build a fission reactor?
I'm not trying to be a sarcastic, smart-ass, either. I'm just wondering aloud really.
And I also meant the fission reactor as an example, not a specific. Essentially, what branches of science are based on evolution? Certainly modern biology and zoology.
It's just that the outcry that goes "If we allow Intelligent Design, we'll revert back to the Stone Age" doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
The Stone Age argument isn't really meant ot mean we revert to the Stone Age, why should anyone even believe it.Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
It is meant to express a devolution of society I guess (note the pun).
You may not care about war, but war cares about you!
Yes teaching it is important. It proves that God is dead, which is the goal of how many people on this board?
Much of biology uses the theory, so yes, it should be taught.
Azi
Mark Twain 1881"If you don't want to work, become a reporter. That awful power, the public opinion of the nation, was created by a horde of self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditch digging and shoemaking and fetched up journalism on their way to the poorhouse."
Neitzche is dead, but due to the nature of Humanity there shall always exist caves in which his shadow can be seen.Originally Posted by Azi Tohak
I am the man.![]()
Why do you hate Freedom?
The US is marching backward to the values of Michael Stivic.
Bookmarks