You say its indistputible yet a good percentage of scientists disbute it.
Which part are you talking about? The fact that CO2 traps heat is very easily verifyable if you want to try it out. This doesnt change from micro to macro, we are still talking abot the same CO2 molecules. A good percentage dispute the degree of the effect, not the existance of the effect. Big difference.

We don't know anything about the atmosphere and temperature works, what your going on isn't fact it is guess work.
No, what we are going on is scientific theory based on empirical evidence. Kind of like aerodynamics or relativity.

Hell, by lowering the Co 2 emmissions we lower the level of global dimming which cools us down.
BS! By lowering PARTICLE EMMISIONS we risk lower the level of so called global dimming (which is just as much a theory as global warming). Interesting that you would believe such a theory and not global warming...

And how my friend do you explain the last 7 ice ages we weren't around to cause?
Because the earth has natural climate change... Whats your point? Does that somehow mean that we are not able to contribute or indeed direct the direction of the cycles by tipping the balances of gas in the atmosphere? Volcanic erruptions have climate effects due to their gasious releases, why should our gasious releases not have an effect? Because we dont want it to and its easier to just burn oil? Head in the sand!