Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman
Maybe you are just looking in all the wrong places.

Wrong places ? OK lets try the Iraqi interior ministry for some good news....Foriegn fighters are leaving Iraq .....great news....oops it carries on .....they are taking their expertise that they have developed in Iraq and are going to spread it elsewhere .
Ah look still only seeing the negative in everything you look for regarding the situation in Iraq. What a wonderful world you must live in.


Now can you prove what they stated is a lie, or is it only that what was stated has shown to be false.
What????the Niger documemnts were known to be forgeries , but they were still included in the claims regardless . That is an example of an outright lie . As was the 45 minute claim , they took a true statement , removed all the specifics and changed the context . As for Rummys comment , he describes it at as viewing things through a prism , when something passes through a prism it is distorted , even if what enters the prism is true then only using one facet to get your results is a distorion of the truth , distortion of the truth is a lie . The photos Powell put forward at the UN were said to be sequencial , in reality they were individual photos taken months apart .
Then maybe you should become a lawyer and try to get them all brought up on charges. Try Tony Blair first since he would be a closer and most likely easier choice to get convicted if a criminal act has been done.

It seems no-one is convince that the evidence you mentioned is a out right lie. Several investigations have been done - in two countries - and look both governments are still standing - and no one has been convicted of lieing. So try again with statements that have not been shown to be lies.