Yes I know, what I fail to see is how militias can achieve something like that. As I see it militias were necessary when your country was forming so no one could take all powers on himself. Now I really don't see the point, the government is formed, you've elections, free press, well at least this is all formalities, but what's the point of another formality? (i.e militias) Because I don't think that militias pass beyond formalism. On the other hand every militia is a potential risk to the stability of the nation itself, not to say the safety of a town. Personally I'll like to see every government, every nation, to disarm themselves, instead of creating inefective militias to take over them.Originally Posted by ceasar010
Bookmarks