On equations, time does slow down.
Assuming the variable of time is included. But I am arguing that the very origin of it is simply related to the function of memory. If you had no memory, time, as it is percieved, would not be noticed.


And since nothing is faster than light
If you can imagine something going faster then light then something probably can. This does not prove time.

Addition.... If something stop movement completely(no heat, therefore no collisions or movement between molecules or atoms) then the said mass would grow infinetly smaller until it dissapears completely. There is a formula for this. It's part of basic Chemistry. After something reaches a certain temprature(really low) it dissapears. It has never happened because the temperature is too low to be generated but it works perfectly mathematically.

"Mass cannot be created or destroyed."

You see the contradiction? If something stoped ALL movement however small it would cease to exist. BUT, then how does anything start to exist. For every effect there must be a cause, right?

Mathematically some things could make sense but they do not necessarily prove anything. But what I said does prove something.