The nature of time...

[Byzantine Prince]

but please dont think you can argue science, especially physics in terms of pure subjective philosophical observations. Eistein's theories have been verified many many times over

And philosophers have argued many times over that time does not exist.

I dont exactly understand your point either, you are saying that if it wasnt for memory, we wouldnt know that time exists? And thus we cant prove it exists. Sure, but memory is a result of time passing

No. Merely that images are engrained in our heads as memories. We see and percieve things change position and we think that it is somehow in our past, when in fact the past doesn't exist, nor the future, only the present.

If a tree falls in a wood and nobody is around does it make any noise? (Now Im starting with Philosophy , and somehow I have a feeling that you will disagree with me on the tree as well... )

That is not philosophy.

The past is just memories, and future merely our exagerated imaginations.