Results 1 to 30 of 54

Thread: The nature of time...

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #16
    Ambiguous Member Byzantine Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Default Re: The nature of time...

    The_Unreality_of_Time


    PS: In philosophy, time is treated as unreal by Spinoza, by Kant, by Hegel, and by Schopenhauer.

    Those are some heavy names in the world of philosophy. I think that the problem is that physics pays no regard to philosophy for the most part, and in doing so, will always be foundamentally wrong.

    BUT, I do however understand why time needs to be used in physics. Now, I think, I understand. It's a framework in which we are able to think of change. That's all. Just a tool that we need to use.

    Quote Originally Posted by Quietus
    For example I disagree with your signature: "If men were born free, they would, so long as they remained free, form no conception of good and evil. -". Men aren't born free ever, since the body is a machine.
    Most men are not free, not in the way that they should anyways. That's why they believe in good and evil.
    Last edited by Byzantine Prince; 10-08-2005 at 03:57.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO