CivIV really isn't that much different from CivIII, so I would hesitate to pay full price (as I did) if you already have that. It is however, imho, a better game than CivIII, so i don't regret buying it.Originally Posted by ah_dut
Now about:
a) corruption has been replaced by other factors like health and unhappiness, infaltion, civic upkeep and a cost per city in order to keep you from spawning cities like cray. pretty much all of these can be countered by adopting the right civics, chosing a leader with the right traits or building some wonders. Iy's still a bit of a hassle to manage a large empire though.
b) The combat system has been completely revised as you probably know. It makes victories a lot more predictable. That said, a rifleman still blew up my modern armour in my last game (no city defense bonusses), it seems like those high powered units don't really live up to their stats to me (winning is one thing, how strong your unit is after the battle is quite another).
The AI does seem less aggressive than it was in civIII, barbarians seem to your main concern in the early turns, and in the later turns civs will rarely attack unless you're culture-absorbing them.Originally Posted by Simon Appleton
That's how I remember CivII to be too, I even got a Pangaea map once when I had selected continents (there was a small landbridge). Other times there were 2 huge continents and a couple of islands, the civs on those islands didn't stand a chance to begin with, I think that's what they were trying to address in CivIV.Originally Posted by Screwtype
Bookmarks