BI all the way. The vastly improved battles almost made me cry when i first played them. After the horrible horrible horrible MTW/STW battles I though I'd never be able to do a field battle in a TW game ever.
Re: BI vs MTW
BI all the way. The vastly improved battles almost made me cry when i first played them. After the horrible horrible horrible MTW/STW battles I though I'd never be able to do a field battle in a TW game ever.
If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.
VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI
I came, I saw, I kicked ass
Re: BI vs MTW
In regards to some people saying about BI AI, you should check out GameSpot's review of the expansion. They actually rated it down (had it as one of the cons) because they said it was too hard.
Re: BI vs MTW
No TW for me anymore, I create my own game engine!
Re: BI vs MTW
After an intensive campaign in MTW I have to say the MTW battles rule supreme. RTW has the better looks and some advantages in the handling (the left-select/right-move system and the working skirmish function) but still...
I also happen to like the MTW sieges better, mainly because they´re not screwed up by the Artificial Idiocy aka pathfinding. Though I do miss the siege equipment like rams etc.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks