Org Mobile Site
Thread: Devil Eyes Condi !!!!!!!
Here is the article:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm
Here is the proof:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...congress_x.htm
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm
Here is the proof:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...congress_x.htm
Originally Posted by :
Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
WTF? The media really hates the right!Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
Ha ha ha! Yeah, that original photo did look pretty frightening.
It's actually interesting to give some thought to the photos chosen by the press for their articles. For example, through much of Bush's first term, I couldn't help but notice that many of the photos I saw on CNN.com were rather, shall we say, poorly timed. He'd be in the middle of saying something, so that his mouth would be twisted into a strange shape, and his whole face would look ridiculous.
Then he won the election. Suddenly, inexplicably, his pictures started to look more normal. His head would appear level again, his mouth closed, and his eyes properly open.
That didn't last long, of course. It was some time ago that his photos began to take on that "candid" look again. I guess the guy will never have many fans among the press.
It's actually interesting to give some thought to the photos chosen by the press for their articles. For example, through much of Bush's first term, I couldn't help but notice that many of the photos I saw on CNN.com were rather, shall we say, poorly timed. He'd be in the middle of saying something, so that his mouth would be twisted into a strange shape, and his whole face would look ridiculous.
Then he won the election. Suddenly, inexplicably, his pictures started to look more normal. His head would appear level again, his mouth closed, and his eyes properly open.
That didn't last long, of course. It was some time ago that his photos began to take on that "candid" look again. I guess the guy will never have many fans among the press.
Originally Posted by Kommodus:
Ha ha ha! Yeah, that original photo did look pretty frightening.
It's actually interesting to give some thought to the photos chosen by the press for their articles. For example, through much of Bush's first term, I couldn't help but notice that many of the photos I saw on CNN.com were rather, shall we say, poorly timed. He'd be in the middle of saying something, so that his mouth would be twisted into a strange shape, and his whole face would look ridiculous.
Then he won the election. Suddenly, inexplicably, his pictures started to look more normal. His head would appear level again, his mouth closed, and his eyes properly open.
That didn't last long, of course. It was some time ago that his photos began to take on that "candid" look again. I guess the guy will never have many fans among the press.
Do you mean silly faces like THESE?Ha ha ha! Yeah, that original photo did look pretty frightening.
It's actually interesting to give some thought to the photos chosen by the press for their articles. For example, through much of Bush's first term, I couldn't help but notice that many of the photos I saw on CNN.com were rather, shall we say, poorly timed. He'd be in the middle of saying something, so that his mouth would be twisted into a strange shape, and his whole face would look ridiculous.
Then he won the election. Suddenly, inexplicably, his pictures started to look more normal. His head would appear level again, his mouth closed, and his eyes properly open.
That didn't last long, of course. It was some time ago that his photos began to take on that "candid" look again. I guess the guy will never have many fans among the press.
Yeah Condi never looked so good.
Id vote for Michelle anytime.
Id vote for Michelle anytime.
Lol, okay strike through works
here's a nice link about bush's nose pre and post-9/11
http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian...es/000631.html
http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian...es/000631.html
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO