Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman
Think about your answer because a certain individual in Iraq claims to be a member of Al Quaeda and is mentioned in the linked article.

How does that relate to ....so far not a single al-quaeda operative has been an iraqi, either. ?
He isn't an Iraqi is he , note the word in the article "probably" , a few other quotes from the article on the subject
Now think about it Tribesman its not hard - if I have to explain it to you - it wouldn't be very amusing for me. How many of Zarqawi are foreign to Iraq and how many are Iraqi - I will give you a clue - no one outside of Zarqawi's network knows the answer to that. A little common sense about how covert or in this case terrorist cells operate could provide you with a clue. (That shouldn't be hard for you to think about now will it.) Like I said earlier think about the answer very carefully, the answer just might surprise you.


No evidence has been found showing senior Iraqi officials were even aware of his presence
most evidence suggests Saddam Hussein did not provide Zarqawi safe haven before the war.
Now since the whole story centred on him getting treatment after losing his leg , yet he still has both legs , just shows it to be bull .
Of course the media never reports the truth just bull to drive up the circulation and fool the idiots that read only the one source of information.