Only the poor will have to eat them, who cares about the poor?Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
*gets shot by Che Guevera's Ghost*
Only the poor will have to eat them, who cares about the poor?Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
*gets shot by Che Guevera's Ghost*
Why do you hate Freedom?
The US is marching backward to the values of Michael Stivic.
Me? *and the Ghost of Mother Theresa*Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
That must be my quote...Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
To tell you the truth, I was looking for a much cooler quote from Che saying something along the lines of "Fidel is not a communist, otherwise he'd have more guns..." But I couldn't find it.
About the topic, I stand by my statement, and would like to add that without idiots, smart people will no longer be smart; the knight is a serf if there is no one under him to be his serf.
Also, I'd like to stress that there *is* a limit to where fiscal conservatism can go. Saving lives is one of the limits; after all, aren't conservatives supposedly are "pro-life?"
Bah, communists.Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
If people are too stupid to be able to live on their own as adults, beh, let's just use them to build a bridge...a meat bridge.That must be my quote...
To tell you the truth, I was looking for a much cooler quote from Che saying something along the lines of "Fidel is not a communist, otherwise he'd have more guns..." But I couldn't find it.
About the topic, I stand by my statement, and would like to add that without idiots, smart people will no longer be smart; the knight is a serf if there is no one under him to be his serf.
Also, I'd like to stress that there *is* a limit to where fiscal conservatism can go. Saving lives is one of the limits; after all, aren't conservatives supposedly are "pro-life?"
Why do you hate Freedom?
The US is marching backward to the values of Michael Stivic.
Mother Theresa, you mean?Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
![]()
![]()
Erm...I think you are in a wrong thread. You see, this thread is not about social welfare (I presume you're talking about this), but is about actually rescuing the people who happens to be in a dangerous position, often by accident. But there is an assumption that many who got themselves into trouble are idiots, and the example in the first post "demonstrates," and thus, the topic: Should idiots be saved? And I answered yes.Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
on a completely unrelated note to Kaiser, I'm actually going to another debate tournament tomorrow-the day after tomorrow! I won LD novice the last one, by the way. It was awesome. This time my topic is about Judicial Activism--whether or not it is necessary to protect the rights of American citizens. Challenging as hell, this topic.
Awesome dude! We have the speaking tournement this december, our coach is making me do the patriot act. I'm already being known as the Patriot act kid cause so far that's been a major point in every compitition I've been in. Good luck with that, hopefully we'll do good in this comp. so we can go to the major one in Penn State, that's a two-nighter as well.Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
Back on topic: Meh, we shouldn't waste the resoruces if it's proven the person's an idiot.![]()
Why do you hate Freedom?
The US is marching backward to the values of Michael Stivic.
What is the threshold for idiot?
Speech Impediment.
Falling off a Segway.
Choking on a pretzel.
Would you save this person or are they below the idiot threshold?
Most people look like idiots at the site of an incident. You cannot make a valid judgement call as we all have accidents. Of all the times you are most likely to look stupid that is when you are in a state of shock after an accident.
So what next kill all those who have had accidents and are dazed afterwards?
Last edited by Papewaio; 11-04-2005 at 04:33.
Yes he does.Originally Posted by Papewaio
Why do you hate Freedom?
The US is marching backward to the values of Michael Stivic.
You should not forget posters in threads like this......Originally Posted by Papewaio
![]()
Bookmarks