Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    Hi,

    I had the idea of a slightly different style of playing a Roman faction in RTW vanilla. Example:

    I´ll start as Julii, but instead of the usual expansionist strategy, I only occupy those few gallic provinces in northern Italy and southern France. After that I restrict myself to upgrading the settlements as far as possible and keeping my borders clear of invaders, even if the senate demands me to attack somewhere else. My goal would be to keep a small but very efficient empire.

    In the meantime, the Brutii should have conquered most of eastern europe or hopefully even beyond that. The idea is that they will reach a level of powerthat makes them challenge the senate. (I hope this can happen indeed and that there are no restrictions in the game which prevent this to happen).

    I imagine it would be quite interesting, to fight as an underdog (and heroic defender of Rome instead of being the bad guy) in the Roman civil war instead of being the superior faction from the begining.

    Any comments are welcome!

    Bastard Operator

  2. #2
    Urwendur Ûrîbêl Senior Member Mouzafphaerre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mikligarðr
    Posts
    6,899

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    .
    I'm pretty much doing it in a non Roman campaign, for and against non Romans. As Greeks, I'm steadily paying off any Pont or Ptolemaian army besieging the only remaining Seleukeian settlement, Sardis, isolated from the far away Seleukeia. Come the time, it will have a price for my noble allies.
    .
    Ja mata Tosa Inu-sama, Hore Tore, Adrian II, Sigurd, Fragony

    Mouzafphaerre is known elsewhere as Urwendil/Urwendur/Kibilturg...
    .

  3. #3
    Slain by mafia-implanted bombs Member littlelostboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Underneath my charred ruins.
    Posts
    355

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    Quote Originally Posted by Bastard Operator
    Hi,

    I had the idea of a slightly different style of playing a Roman faction in RTW vanilla. Example:

    I´ll start as Julii, but instead of the usual expansionist strategy, I only occupy those few gallic provinces in northern Italy and southern France. After that I restrict myself to upgrading the settlements as far as possible and keeping my borders clear of invaders, even if the senate demands me to attack somewhere else. My goal would be to keep a small but very efficient empire.

    In the meantime, the Brutii should have conquered most of eastern europe or hopefully even beyond that. The idea is that they will reach a level of powerthat makes them challenge the senate. (I hope this can happen indeed and that there are no restrictions in the game which prevent this to happen).

    I imagine it would be quite interesting, to fight as an underdog (and heroic defender of Rome instead of being the bad guy) in the Roman civil war instead of being the superior faction from the begining.

    Any comments are welcome!

    Bastard Operator
    That would be nice. But the thing that if you don't listen to the Senate wouldn't they come after your throat like start imposing heavy fines or do investigation on 'certain' family members? Then soon you will receive a message on ordering your leader to commit sucide. The Senate demands that you obey and subject to their whims completely. I tried in R:TW not listening to them at all, I mean, only doing certain missions for my benefits and the rest just ignoring them. Then Bam! Around turn 120, I was outlawed.

    But that's a nice idea to play as an underdog. Have a lot of challenge. I tried that in RTW (h/h) and phew, nearly got slaughtered. But go ahead, do it if you think you can survive.
    My name is Asinius Commodus, son of the Eagle.
    __________________

    Fellow of the Seven Legendary Writers (but got kicked out)

    KoW: Erm, LLB, Asinus means 'ass' in Latin
    LLB: Really? All the better for a story of how an ass became a great leader is alwasy a bestseller.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    Thank you for your comments.

    In my experience ignoring the senate´s orders is only dangerous if your faction is already near the "critical point", i.e. you control 30 or more provinces. Before that you only lose some popularity, but that´s all.

    My major concern is just, if an AI controlled Roman faction can actually become the outlawed one. Has anybody of you ever seen this happen?

  5. #5
    Sage of Bread Member Rilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EB Tavern, Professing my superiority.
    Posts
    932

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    (to idea itself)hmm it might be a good idea but maby give your generals experiance by doing the senate misions then letting the settlement.. whatever taken go rebel that way you get profit from looting and stuff and maintain the senates happyness

  6. #6

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    Quote Originally Posted by Rilder
    (to idea itself)hmm it might be a good idea but maby give your generals experiance by doing the senate misions then letting the settlement.. whatever taken go rebel that way you get profit from looting and stuff and maintain the senates happyness
    Thanks for your interest, Rilder!

    Well, of course you could go for a little oversea plundering while waiting for the Brutii to get outlawed. But remeber the real goal is not to get liked but to be a little lesser hated than the Brutii. I ignored dozens of senate missions and I still have 6, sometimes 7 popularity points with the senate. It appears to me, you are best appreciated if you look harmless to the senate.

    But in my game I chose to ignore all orders to attack Carthage for two other reasons: The steady trading income in the mediterranean sea is more valuable than a single plundering of a city in the long run. And the need for battle hardened troops isn´t that high when you can build Urban Cohorts with 5 exp from the start. Watch my posting in the Julii guide.

    And the commanders can earn their stars by knocking out rebels/gauls/britons that dare entering your realm. Just make sure that the troops used for this are not overwhelming cause such victories gain no command stars for the general.

    Bastard Operator

  7. #7

    Default Re: Being the underdog in a Roman civil war

    I played once as the Scipii following this very strategy. I decided that as i was after precious first cohorts i would try and accomplish every senate mission. I nurtured my heartland, but pretty much everything else i give to the brutii to encourage them growing to the point that they woud be outlawed.

    The brutii found it very difficult to hold on to their empire and i kept on having to put down their rebellions for them, but after a very long time (perillously close to game end) they were finally declared outlawed. I got a message from the senate saying that i had to declare war on the brutti or be investigated by the censor. i had one turn to comply.

    I enthusiastically did exactly that, only to be told that i did not have the required popularity to declare war on another roman faction. Luckily, as the censor was from my own faction i survived the investigation, but i still had to wait a further 10 precious years before the brutii got round to declaring war on me before i could attack them and capture their empire.

    It would seem that the designers didn't actually think what might happen if the player didn't start the civil war

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO