Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: Rebellion vs. confromism

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #36
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Rebellion vs. confromism

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulforged
    Of course it's a creation, but there's creations that are founded beyond all doubt and constitutes the basis of system (axiological concepts) and those that can change subjectevly. I also have a problem with monogamy, I follow Rouseau.
    Gah. I hate Rousseau. Reading him gives me migraine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulforged
    I'm argentinian remember?...Anyway I understood what you were trying to say. "Il Principe" is one of my favuorites readings.
    However, remember that Machiavelli and Machiavellian are actually rather different. Many scholars argue that Machiavelli himself (the author) is not a Machiavellian; I do not know that in detail, but I believe it's along the lines of examining Machiavelli's later writings--in The Prince, he condemns the "evil dictators," for one. The "Machiavellian" philosophy, on the other hand, justifies whatever means necessary for an achievable goal, even if it's Stalinistic means. In other words the utterly pragmatic point of view.
    Last edited by AntiochusIII; 11-11-2005 at 06:01.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO