Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: "Huge" unit setting

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    I wish I could play in huge - I like the economic challeges it adds. Do I go for this unit, or that one? I can only afford one...

    But my lappy can't handle that...


  2. #2
    Just another genius Member aw89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The land of sleet
    Posts
    445

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    Errrm, units don't cost more on huge (If I'm not horribly mistaken here) they only pull more poeple from the cites. (Obviously)

    EDIT: Can't spell


  3. #3
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    I thought they cost more, since cost is determined by a soldier basis.

    They do cost more upkeep and draw more people.

  4. #4
    Senior member Senior Member Dutch_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Holland.
    Posts
    5,006

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    I always play Large, the middle way.

    I like the 80 man , infantry units.

    I could play Huge, computer spec. wise, but I still prefer to play large.

    I'm an athiest. I get offended everytime I see a cold, empty room. - MRD


  5. #5
    Elephant Master Member Conqueror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In the Ruins of Europe
    Posts
    1,258

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    I love huge. It makes a big difference with things like population management (you'll have to avoid training infantry in slow-growing cities). Infantry lines work better in field battles because the line is much longer, meaning that it takes some time to move even fastest units from one end of the line to another. This is especially useful if you play with phalanxes.

    RTW, 167 BC: Rome expels Greek philosophers after the Lex Fannia law is passed. This bans the effete and nasty Greek practice of 'philosophy' in favour of more manly, properly Roman pursuits that don't involve quite so much thinking.

  6. #6
    Assistant Mod Mod Member GiantMonkeyMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    plymouth - scrubbing Beirut's toilet with a cat...
    Posts
    886

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    i would play on huge but my computer can only handle large and that still is laggy.... if only i could

  7. #7
    Hǫrðar Member Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hordaland, Norway
    Posts
    6,449

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
    I always play Large, the middle way.

    I like the 80 man , infantry units.

    I could play Huge, computer spec. wise, but I still prefer to play large.

    Agree

    I can play with huge without problems, but the navigation on the battlefield is painful, and having population problems isn`t really a wanted challenge. Probably not good for the AI either.
    Runes for good luck:

    [1 - exp(i*2π)]^-1

  8. #8
    Magister Vitae Senior Member Kraxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Posts
    7,129

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    I have modded the game so that I have an Extra-Large setting, with 100 men as the basis. It is lovely. Not as uncontrollable and Huge, but more epic than Large, not as destructive as Huge (population depletetion) but longer lasting than Large. And it is hardly lagging which can be a problem on Huge.

    I urge you to try it.
    You may not care about war, but war cares about you!


  9. #9
    Urwendur Ûrîbêl Senior Member Mouzafphaerre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mikligarðr
    Posts
    6,899

    Default Re: "Huge" unit setting

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraxis
    I have modded the game so that I have an Extra-Large setting, with 100 men as the basis. It is lovely. Not as uncontrollable and Huge, but more epic than Large, not as destructive as Huge (population depletetion) but longer lasting than Large. And it is hardly lagging which can be a problem on Huge.

    I urge you to try it.
    .
    Done! It's fun and challenging in which you have to think twice before exterminating a settlement if you want to garrison it immediately.
    .
    Ja mata Tosa Inu-sama, Hore Tore, Adrian II, Sigurd, Fragony

    Mouzafphaerre is known elsewhere as Urwendil/Urwendur/Kibilturg...
    .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO