US Involvement in Iraq: A Scaled Assessment (poll)

**ichi** · 11-14-2005, 05:49

Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh

Yep -- though I disagree with you a good bit, you do express yourself clearly #1.

*bows*

It is possible to disagree and still respect; You do good yourself mate.

ichi

**QwertyMIDX** · 11-14-2005, 06:29

I voted for a combination of #3 and #4, although I think there is more to it than either summary contains. I'm also more strongly against the war than such a vote would led one to believe, but my reasoning is rather different than the condemnation in summary #4.

**PanzerJaeger** · 11-14-2005, 07:27

Summary #1 is the most accurate.

**Franconicus** · 11-14-2005, 08:01

4 is an excellent summary. Thanx!

**Red Harvest** · 11-14-2005, 08:47

Why does PJ get to vote twice? It's showing him twice for #1. Wondering how that happened?

**PanzerJaeger** · 11-14-2005, 09:10

Its called status... same reason OJ got off. Us VIPs eat nobodies like you for breakfast.

(I honestly have no clue, but I like it.)

**Adrian II** · 11-14-2005, 13:50

Unsurprisingly, I voted for a combination of three and four. I do not believe in single-motive or single-effect analyses of foreign policy, although sometimes it is hard not to speak or argue about it in such terms.

On a side-note I am happy to see that our elusive Mormon has voted in the poll, thus proving that he is not entirely lost to the .org. They seek him here, they seek him there...