Results 1 to 30 of 37

Thread: WW2 with different outcomes

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #13
    Just another pixel Member Upxl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    500

    Default Re: WW2 with different outcomes

    The falling of Leningrad would have been catastrophy to SU.
    Leningrad was nothing more then a symbolic target.
    The true power of the SU lied more south/east.

    It was the discussion Hitler had with his generals.
    They wanted to attack the soviet supplies of raw materials and oil reserves.
    Hitler wanted to Capture Leningrad to show the world he had crushed the SU.
    Just another fatal mistake in a long line of military errors.

    But to get back to the subject.

    WW II was lost to the axes from the very beginning.
    The 2 fatal mistakes Hitler never should have made:

    *Attacking the Soviet Union: This was one of the most critical events that took place.
    Because the Russians didn’t join the Allies to distribute the final punches in the 1st WW,
    the Germans never did learn the lesson of the weight of a 2front war.


    *Failing to invade England:

    He left the Europe war scene without completing it.
    Leaving behind a weakened but nevertheless dangerous enemy.
    At the battle of Britain the little *prick* should have stayed destroying the Raf’s infrastructure.

    All the decisions and event’s that came afterwards wouldn’t have made much difference.
    The war could have lasted longer or be more disastrous, but the Axes would still have lost it.

    (Language... though only mild. -Kraxis)
    Last edited by Kraxis; 12-05-2005 at 00:04.
    I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO