Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Worst off path Crusade ever!

  1. #31
    Roasted To Perfection Member Microwavegerbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    78

    Default Re: Worst off path Crusade ever!

    Massive naval showdowns are pretty good fun, although in my recent campaign on XL mod the Danes are beginning to look dangerous. They have several stacks of ships near Spain, and though not as insane as they are on the screenshot I've seen floating around, they're getting there.

  2. #32
    Friend of Lady Luck Member Mooks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,290

    Default Re: Worst off path Crusade ever!

    Running a crusade through your enemy's armys is the best way to start a war
    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    i love the idea that angsty-teens can get so spazzed out by computer games that they try to rage-rape themselves with a remote.

  3. #33
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: Worst off path Crusade ever!

    Quote Originally Posted by The Darkhorn
    One thing about seperating ships though. One on One they tend to lose 70% to the Italian and Sicilian alliance breakers. Any other ships DON'T seem to be able to help it in that situation. The AI attacks your "stack," in this case of one ship. It would be better to keep them all together when at peace and just sitting there. It may even discourage these notorious trade route disrupting attacks anyway. The AI's not likely to attack your stack of 2 barques and a caravel with his firegalley, but he will laugh and sink your stack of one of your barques while your other two ships watch, cheer, and drink beer.
    Absolutely! Naval fights are just between two fleets and one-ship fleets are considered irresistable by the A.I. Only separate a single fast ship if you want to catch a small enemy fleet that is most likely going to flee when you attack with the big stack.

    When in Naval war, I always try to clear the sealanes of opposing fleets as fast as possible, but land war has the priority. BTW, several players say that succes in sea battles is inversely related to succes on dry land, so sending a unit of peasants on a suicide attack just before a decisive sea battle is a good way of ensuring success. I have never tried this, though.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  4. #34
    Defeater of the Wicker People Member The Darkhorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi USA
    Posts
    154

    Default Re: Worst off path Crusade ever!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens
    Absolutely! Naval fights are just between two fleets and one-ship fleets are considered irresistable by the A.I. Only separate a single fast ship if you want to catch a small enemy fleet that is most likely going to flee when you attack with the big stack.

    When in Naval war, I always try to clear the sealanes of opposing fleets as fast as possible, but land war has the priority. BTW, several players say that succes in sea battles is inversely related to succes on dry land, so sending a unit of peasants on a suicide attack just before a decisive sea battle is a good way of ensuring success. I have never tried this, though.
    I find if I keep 2-3 ships in every zone with a a couple of larger ones to augment storm losses, I avoid the backstabbing naval attacks.
    We are men of action...lies do not become us.

  5. #35
    Could be your God Member Abokasee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    1,487

    Default Re: Worst off path Crusade ever!

    MostCrusade I launch are against...MONGOLS
    Now with transparent layers!

    Lost on the Internet? Go back to start.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO