Once a child molestor...

**Kanamori** · 11-21-2005, 20:26

Being circumcised as an adult would hurt

**Duke Malcolm** · 11-21-2005, 20:29

Exactly

**Lemur** · 11-21-2005, 20:32

Originally Posted by Kanamori

Being circumcised as an adult would hurt

That's the origin of the schism between Judaism and Christianity. The Greeks didn't feel like going through adult circumcision. Without painkillers. Without antibiotics. The followers of Jesus said, "Eh, it's okay, you don't really have to do that," to which the Jews said, "Yes you do." It all ended in tears.

As for pedophiles, I've read some conflicting things about their recidivism rate. Not sure who I believe. Locking someone up for life is a very expensive piece of business, so I'd be all in favor of treatment, whether that's a drug therapy or chemical castration.

Also, is it just this lemur, or isn't there a pretty big difference between someone who sexualizes a teenager and somone who lusts for pre-teens? I mean, there's no linguistic or legal distinction, but it seems there ought to be. A person who wants to have sex with a gorgeous sixteen-year-old is misguided, but not necessarily bent and unfixable. On the other hand, a person who wants to have sex with a three-year-old is probably broken beyond repair.

Shouldn't we distinguish? Or is that opening a whole 'nother can of worms?

**DemonArchangel** · 11-21-2005, 20:33

Gary Glitter? Ugh....

This man won't even be worth the dog food he'll create when we shove him into an industrial meat grinder.

**Adrian II** · 11-21-2005, 20:44

Originally Posted by Lemurmania

Shouldn't we distinguish?

No, we should not. You see, this thread is just another opportunity to vent adolescent ennui. So far we have castration/4, hanging or drawing/2, shot in the head/6. Faites vos jeux.

**Redleg** · 11-21-2005, 21:57

Originally Posted by Lemurmania

Also, is it just this lemur, or isn't there a pretty big difference between someone who sexualizes a teenager and somone who lusts for pre-teens? I mean, there's no linguistic or legal distinction, but it seems there ought to be. A person who wants to have sex with a gorgeous sixteen-year-old is misguided, but not necessarily bent and unfixable. On the other hand, a person who wants to have sex with a three-year-old is probably broken beyond repair.

Shouldn't we distinguish? Or is that opening a whole 'nother can of worms?

There should be and for the most part there is.