Quote Originally Posted by Grey_Fox
If he's American-born, why was he held as an 'enemy combatant'? Why didn't they just charge him with treason and fry him if found guilty?
My point exactly. If he had not renounced US citizenship, was captured domestically, and was not "under arms" at the time, then we have an alleged criminal and not an enemy combatant. Most of the other detainee decisions I have agreed with, but this one -- no.