Wow, does he have a limited imaginationOriginally Posted by NeonGod
![]()
Depends on the person though, some people really aren't wired for the whole self sacrifice thing. A purely selfish tactic can be effective from a genetic point of view.Originally Posted by Papewaio
In the first case, it might be that you've inhereted genes your siblings have not, and therefor spreading YOUR genes would be more important to you. Also about 10% of all people isn't from the father they think, so putting yourself above your siblings would seem like a valid strategy.
In the second case, you're right of course, but your reproductve years go on for quiet a bit, especially if you're male. Most people would sacrifice themselves for their children if they were old and given the choice, some will not. Those are probably a special case of the next situation.
In the third case, if you're male, 3 children can easily be replaced from a biological POV. Some people concetrate on raising a limited number of children giving them everything they can (see all the 1 child families in Europe and in the last few decades) while some people (mostly men) concentrate on producing as many children as possible, not really caring about what happens to them. Both are valid survival strategies for your genes, so it is very uncertain what the best option in situation 3 would be, and what you will do by instinct.
Gotta love neo-darwinism![]()
It's a bit like space I guess, if it were infinitly devisable the turtle would never catch the hare, therefor there most be a lower limit to the amount of space that can be crossed.Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
Bookmarks