Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 51

Thread: nationalize or privatize

  1. #1
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default nationalize or privatize

    nationalization - Definition : (of a government) to take control of a business or industry

    privatize - Definition : If a government privatizes an industry, company or service that it owns and controls, it sells it so that it becomes privately owned and controlled

    Which do you think are best?
    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  2. #2
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Some activities I believe need to be run by the state, a form of health service (most minimal to care for the most needy) and Postal services etc.

    However, other activities, such as mining, power, transport etc, I feel can only be run efficiently and effectively in private hands.
    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  3. #3
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Everything but postal should be privitized.

    The private industry is hugely more efficient, which benefits consumers and taxpayers.

    Crazed Rabbit
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member Ser Clegane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Escaped from the pagodas
    Posts
    6,606

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
    Everything but postal should be privitized.
    Curious - why, of all services, should postal not be privatized?

  5. #5
    Viceroy of the Indian Empire Member Duke Malcolm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Dùn Dèagh, the People's Republic of Scotland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
    Posts
    2,783

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    A mix of both...

    Basic infrastructure (telecommunication lines, roads, railtracks, Aeroport Authorities, power lines), the Post Office, water supply, prisons, health, education should be nationalised.

    Actual transport (planes, trains, buses), energy supply, health, education, mining, drilling, and most other things should be privatised
    It was not theirs to reason why,
    It was not theirs to make reply,
    It was theirs but to do or die.
    -The Charge of the Light Brigade - Alfred, Lord Tennyson

    "Wherever this stone shall lie, the King of the Scots shall rule"
    -Prophecy of the Stone of Destiny

    "For God, For King and country, For loved ones home and Empire, For the sacred cause of justice, and The freedom of the world, They buried him among the kings because he, Had done good toward God and toward his house."
    -Inscription on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior

  6. #6
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    I think the best would be a mix of both, if biased towards privatization.

    I don't know if I want privitized prisons.

    However, I think some things should be "statized" - state governments controlling them instead of the feds.

  7. #7
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : nationalize or privatize

    Activities like transport, postal, power, health, have to be nationalized to ensure efficiency, low cost and availability to everyone.
    Commercial activites shall remain privately owned.
    Last edited by Meneldil; 11-30-2005 at 22:42.

  8. #8
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : nationalize or privatize

    Hum, yeah, I'm going to edit that

  9. #9
    Yesdachi swallowed by Jaguar! Member yesdachi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,454

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Privatize everything that is not critical to basic national functionality. Like roads, very basic healthcare, prison, court system, police, military, some others but basically the things that absolutely need to be in place should be nationalized. Then privatize everything else but keep a watchdog system in place so corporations or influential people cant gain too much power.
    Peace in Europe will never stay, because I play Medieval II Total War every day. ~YesDachi

  10. #10
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    I think you can privatize everyhing else then the Government itself,the emergency services,the police and the Army.
    I personally like the nationalized Healthcare system,but i dont see why it could not work also provided by Privat hospitals.
    Same goes with the education.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  11. #11
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re : nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by Meneldil
    Activities like transport, postal, power, health, have to be nationalized to ensure efficiency, low cost and availability to everyone.
    I agree!

    Though I'm not so sure about those lower costs. Nor that efficiency either.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  12. #12
    A Veteran Wargamer Member kiwitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    915

    Default Privatise ... however

    however limit what is privatised to non-monopolies.

    Do not privatise

    ROADS, RAIL, WATER, ELECTRICITY, TELEPHONE.

    However you pay for the usage of these, and compention for additional products using these. e.g. scented water.
    We work to live, and to live is to, play "Total War" or drive a VR-4

  13. #13
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: Privatise ... however

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwitt
    however limit what is privatised to non-monopolies.

    Do not privatise

    ROADS, RAIL, WATER, ELECTRICITY, TELEPHONE.

    However you pay for the usage of these, and compention for additional products using these. e.g. scented water.
    In my country those are privat companies. Altough the State and cities own large part of their stocks.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  14. #14

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Nationalize all the industries and services, even the small stands where boys sell lemonade (yes, I stole that from nationstates)
    Common Unreflected Drinking Only Smartens

  15. #15
    Scandinavian and loving it Member Lazul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Thule
    Posts
    1,323

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    All infrastructure, Nationalize.

    Most of the rest, privet.

    By doing so, you garante a stable basic ground for the privet companies, who tend to f**k things up to work on and grow and crumble as they are prone to do.
    People will be happy since they get a feeling of freedom and also happy since everything wont get all scewed up.
    www.overspun.com

    "Freedom without opportunity is a devil's gift."
    --Noam Chomsky

  16. #16
    Member Member bmolsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    The important thing is not privatization. The important thing is competition. No monopolies should be allowed. Who actually owns the legal entities is irrelevant.

  17. #17
    zombologist Senior Member doc_bean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Riding Shai-Hulud
    Posts
    5,346

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Privatizing only works if you can guarantee sufficient competition, that's imho what's causing all these problems with privatisation in Europe.

    That said, I feel trains should remain nationalized, i find our current system much more efficient than the privatized dutch system (*shudder*). Distribution of electricity shouldn't be privatized either, think of all the extra lines that would be needed ! Roads by private companies works in france, but wouldn't in Belgium. Water is partly privatized already, the postal services are a money pit anyway, I don't see any profit in it either way.
    Yes, Iraq is peaceful. Go to sleep now. - Adrian II

  18. #18
    Member Member lugh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Éire
    Posts
    377

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    I'm in favour of nationalizing a lot of stuff, but not in a monopolistic manner.
    For example, here at least, some bus routes etc just aren't economical but serve a social purpose; with even partial privatization we've seen routes cut off. So let the private industry in but maintain a state network as well, after all, competition is good.

    Another matter is strategic interest. Energy is too important to allow into solely private hands, a state operator is needed to ensure minimum service in times of emergency. Here at least, the energy pool is private where the infrastructure is nationalized, everyone power comes from a pool, so each company doesn't have the cost of laying lines etc etc
    Same in telephone, or was until the state company was privatised, AFAIK the infrastructure is still the states property.
    Last edited by lugh; 12-01-2005 at 12:25.

  19. #19

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Nationalise everything and run it for profit.

    Seriously, the main thing wrong with nationalised industries is they have ne incentive to be competitive, if you could tie in profit making to bonuses etc then I'm sure they would be much more efficient.

  20. #20
    Things Change Member JAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    London, England.
    Posts
    11,058

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    All infrastructure and other industry vital to the running and well being of the people in the state should be nationalised, it is simply not good enough to allow such important industry to be at the hands of market forces, there can be no loosers in this industry, thus nationalisation is the only way forward which is fair to everyone.

    However I am shifting on how exactly you run the nationalised industry, I would be willing to see some private companies run certain aspects of an industry. For instance using private companies to build the buildings for the NHS, etc. Things such as that I don't really have much problem with.
    GARCIN: I "dreamt," you say. It was no dream. When I chose the hardest path, I made my choice deliberately. A man is what he wills himself to be.
    INEZ: Prove it. Prove it was no dream. It's what one does, and nothing else, that shows the stuff one's made of.
    GARCIN: I died too soon. I wasn't allowed time to - to do my deeds.
    INEZ: One always dies too soon - or too late. And yet one's whole life is complete at that moment, with a line drawn neatly under it, ready for the summing up. You are - your life, and nothing else.

    Jean Paul Sartre - No Exit 1944

  21. #21
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    One should only privatise when there is real competition, otherwise the big cats will all take a slice of the pie and enjoy it together, and artificially keep the price high to secure their business. We are seeing that now here in Dutchiestan with the energy sector, you need a 'fresh' market which makes sense enough for new investers to make it happen.

  22. #22
    Member Member Kanamori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    1,924

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony
    [O]therwise the big cats will all take a slice of the pie and enjoy it together, and artificially keep the price high to secure their business.
    This is only in markets where there will always be high demand. Energy, food, and housing, among other things. Otherwise, they cannot simply jack the prices up as people will simply decide the price outweighs the product.

    Quote Originally Posted by JAG
    All infrastructure and other industry vital to the running and well being of the people in the state should be nationalised, it is simply not good enough to allow such important industry to be at the hands of market forces, there can be no loosers in this industry, thus nationalisation is the only way forward which is fair to everyone.
    Nationalization does not gaurantee the effectiveness of some industry, only that the people have more control over it. Nationalizing is not the only way to increase reliability; one can set requirements for those industries based on an interest in public health, which is how many of the things such as energy are done here.

  23. #23
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Hmmm, I recall hearing about some country that tried your 'nationalize everything' scheme, what was it? Hmm...oh yes, it was the Soviet Union! Perhaps we should ask them how it turned out. That is, we could if they still existed.

    JAG, you act as if market forces are some crazy lottery where industries randomly crash. As can be seen from numerous examples around the globe, this does not happen. Important industries continue because they make an important product.

    Also, privitized companies are always more efficient. Nationalizing everything would lower the standard of living as it becomes more expensive to get the same goods. Also, in a nationalized economy, since there are no market forces to determine the price for goods, the whole economy becomes whacked and production isn't geared towards what is actually needed, since you can't determine how much you need one item compared to another item.

    Nationalization is most certainly not 'a way forward', it's a way to stagnate your economy, reduce human rights, and the civil rights of your people.

    Crazed Rabbit
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  24. #24
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
    JAG, you act as if market forces are some crazy lottery where industries randomly crash. As can be seen from numerous examples around the globe, this does not happen. Important industries continue because they make an important product.
    But they will make that product only if they have to, to privatise an allready saturated market is asking for trouble because of the lack of demand. Some things you just cannot leave to the market because they are just too important to throw at the wolves, there are people in this world that only think about profits.

  25. #25
    Insomniac and tired of it Senior Member Slyspy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,868

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
    Also, privitized companies are always more efficient. Nationalizing everything would lower the standard of living as it becomes more expensive to get the same goods. Also, in a nationalized economy, since there are no market forces to determine the price for goods, the whole economy becomes whacked and production isn't geared towards what is actually needed, since you can't determine how much you need one item compared to another item.

    Nationalization is most certainly not 'a way forward', it's a way to stagnate your economy, reduce human rights, and the civil rights of your people.

    Crazed Rabbit
    No, sorry, I don't get it. We in Britain have seen any number of badly handled privatisations go wrong. Many of the so called private enterprises are badly run, formed on poorly a planned basis and are continually bailed out with tax-payers money (especially the rail network, which has been partially re-nationalised). If a service (these projects are usually services and utilities) id not profitable then don't buy it off the government. If it turns out not to be profitable then don't cry about it and beg the government to bail you out. They'll buy you out quick enough when you go bankrupt. If we pay a big chunk of cash out to keep their shareholders happy (apparently many are unaware that such ventures do not automatically bring a return) then why not renationalise? At least then there is more accountability.
    "Put 'em in blue coats, put 'em in red coats, the bastards will run all the same!"

    "The English are a strange people....They came here in the morning, looked at the wall, walked over it, killed the garrison and returned to breakfast. What can withstand them?"

  26. #26
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    All infrastructure and other industry vital to the running and well being of the people in the state should be nationalised, it is simply not good enough to allow such important industry to be at the hands of market forces, there can be no loosers in this industry, thus nationalisation is the only way forward which is fair to everyone.
    If it is run by a government you will have inefficiency and no investment will be made to improve productivity. All you have to do is look at the British motor industry to understand that. If you examine the Japanese companies in the UK compared the the British ones and you will see what I mean.

    BTW how are you enjoying Staffordshire
    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  27. #27
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
    If it is run by a government you will have inefficiency and no investment will be made to improve productivity. All you have to do is look at the British motor industry to understand that. If you examine the Japanese companies in the UK compared the the British ones and you will see what I mean.
    Indeed, when you nationalize an industry, its not that there are no losers- its that everyone loses.
    Last edited by Xiahou; 12-02-2005 at 00:30.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  28. #28
    Yesdachi swallowed by Jaguar! Member yesdachi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,454

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Mass nationalism would be communism (right?), would mass privatization be a form of feudalism with CEO’s replacing Barons?
    Peace in Europe will never stay, because I play Medieval II Total War every day. ~YesDachi

  29. #29

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by yesdachi
    Mass nationalism would be communism (right?), would mass privatization be a form of feudalism with CEO’s replacing Barons?
    I believe the word for that form is capatilism
    Common Unreflected Drinking Only Smartens

  30. #30
    Insomniac and tired of it Senior Member Slyspy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,868

    Default Re: nationalize or privatize

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
    If it is run by a government you will have inefficiency and no investment will be made to improve productivity. All you have to do is look at the British motor industry to understand that. If you examine the Japanese companies in the UK compared the the British ones and you will see what I mean.

    BTW how are you enjoying Staffordshire
    I would argue that utilities and infrastructure can benefit from nationalisation from a service point of view. They can also be run on a not-for-profit basis. Industries such as car manufacturing fall into a different classification. They are non-essential and are solely for profit and as such nationalisation would be neither useful nor desirable.

    Oh and it is quite feudal in a way, especially when it comes to the balance of power better business and government. Significant differences are the the workers are not serfs and are free to leave at any time to seek alternative employment, employers rarely have direct control over their worker's private lives and that workers can enjoy a share of the wealth created by their labours.
    Last edited by Slyspy; 12-02-2005 at 01:05.
    "Put 'em in blue coats, put 'em in red coats, the bastards will run all the same!"

    "The English are a strange people....They came here in the morning, looked at the wall, walked over it, killed the garrison and returned to breakfast. What can withstand them?"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO