Your best generals

[lugh]

Probably an ex Prince, but as the virtues show, he's fought long and hard. He had full piety I think or maybe 8 points but Butcher knowcked that down.

Can valour go above 9?

[Gtafanboy]

My game glitched once and I had a Valour 37 Viking Unit. It didn't lose any men at all for 300 years.

[Ludens]

My game glitched once and I had a Valour 37 Viking Unit. It didn't lose any men at all for 300 years.

I remember seeing a screenshot of a late Spanish royal knight with 40 valour. He was the only survivor of his unit. Mind you, combat calculations are capped at +20 and -20, so there is a limit to how much valour will do.

And they're not exroyals anyways. Miho's generals are not exroyals. The crowm stays afterward or else what would be the point of it. ANyone could jsut read the pricne part and know they're royals. Do you need screen shots to prove it. Ill take a shot of a prince before and after his brother becomes King.

I dont even need to do that anyways if you notice Graphics general is referred to as Lord not prince so hes obviousl had one ofhis brothers crowned yet at same time he still has the crown indicating royal blood. So princes keep the crown thing.

In VI all generals, not just royal ones, will eventually die of old age. They are replaced by a general with identical stats (unless you use the green_generals command line), but a different name and no royal connections. They don't show the crown symbol as well, though they are in fact just copies of ex-royals.

[Knight Templar]

In VI all generals, not just royal ones, will eventually die of old age. They are replaced by a general with identical stats (unless you use the green_generals command line), but a different name and no royal connections. They don't show the crown symbol as well, though they are in fact just copies of ex-royals.

To confirm this:




From my Byzantine campaign. Although they don't have crown simbol, they are ex-princes with different names, wich can be noticed through their very high command for example.

[miho]

In VI all generals, not just royal ones, will eventually die of old age. They are replaced by a general with identical stats (unless you use the green_generals command line), but a different name and no royal connections. They don't show the crown symbol as well, though they are in fact just copies of ex-royals.

But then they are not ex-royals if those died. The fact that their replacements are as them the same doesn't matter. The point is that these are not ex princes.

And KT your generals don't have a crown. They might aswell be "normal" ones You should have taken pics of before and after the royal one died.

These ex-royal units should be excluded.

But why are we having this argue? Why couldn't princes compete as best generals? The thread is called "Your best generals" not "Your best non-royal generals 'cause others can't compete with them"

[Knight Templar]

And KT your generals don't have a crown. They might aswell be "normal" ones You should have taken pics of before and after the royal one died.

But why are we having this argue? Why couldn't princes compete as best generals? The thread is called "Your best generals" not "Your best non-royal generals 'cause others can't compete with them"

1. I know, but it's obvious they're ex-royals (look at their stats)
2. Ok, I'll post letar pics of mine good generals

[Knight Templar]

2. Ok, I'll post letar pics of mine good generals

So, 1 non-royal general (Byzantine campaign)




and 1 ex-prince from my Croatian campaign


note, he has no titles for improving acumen and command

[miho]

They're both good. How come Ivan Šubić isn't a governor?

[miho]

@lugh What's the other faction on the pics?

[Marquis de Said]

@lugh What's the other faction on the pics?

It's the Genoese in XL Mod.

[miho]

How did they get so big? You're gonna have some hard time defeating them.