Dems determined to ignore progress in Iraq

[Hurin_Rules]

Oh yes, the Iraqi's were better off under Sadam werent they?

That does bring up an interesting question.... the statistics that show increases in terror attacks- do they include Iraq? If so, and I suspect they do, then it gets a big fat "no-duh" from me.

Interesting. So, instead of providing actual facts in a thread that is complaining that the facts are being ignored, you're telling us how you would spin facts that contradict your opinion, if your baseless assumptions should prove correct?

FYI: your baseless assumptions are incorrect. The attacks in Iraq account only for about a third of the total terror attacks in the world, yet the number of terror attacks has more than tripled since 2003.

Sources:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0428/dailyUpdate.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...042601623.html

But I guess this us just all part of a secret plot by evil democrats to ignore the facts, isn't it?