Your true nature!

**Meneldil** · 12-08-2005, 23:04

Neutral, I just don't give a poof about what's happening around me.

Neutral

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way.

A correct description (except that I'm not a she)

**Devastatin Dave** · 12-09-2005, 00:15

Originally Posted by Meneldil

A correct description (except that I'm not a she)

It must know you're from france then...

**Kaiser of Arabia** · 12-09-2005, 00:32

Based on your answers to the quiz, your character’s most likely alignment is Neutral Evil.

Neutral Evil

A neutral evil villain does whatever she can get away with. She is out for herself, pure and simple. She sheds no tears for those she kills, whether for profit, sport, or convenience. She has no love of order and holds no illusion that following laws, traditions, or codes would make her any better or more noble. On the other hand, she doesn’t have the restless nature or love of conflict that a chaotic evil villain has. The criminal who robs and murders to get what she wants is neutral evil. Some neutral evil villains hold up evil as an ideal, committing evil for its own sake. Most often, such villains are devoted to evil deities or secret societies. The common phrase for neutral evil is "true evil." Neutral evil is the most dangerous alignment because it represents pure evil without honor and without variation.

--excerpted from the Player’s Handbook, Chapter 6

Keep in mind the alignment suggested by the quiz is just that: a suggestion. It describes your character no better than a 36-question test would describe you. But it’s a good way to start thinking about how your character acts when confronted with issues of alignment.

Now that your character has taken the test, make a note of which questions scored in the opposite direction from your overall alignment. These exceptions can tell some interesting tales about your character Are you a good character with a greedy streak? Are you a lawful character who can’t stand the village elders? Don’t just roleplay your alignment -- roleplay your alignment exceptions, too. Few characters perfectly embody their alignment choice.

**kiwitt** · 12-09-2005, 00:36

True Neutral. Interestingly that makes me "Moderate" here.

"A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion."

**Quid** · 12-09-2005, 00:48

Unsurprisingly neutral.

Quid

**yesdachi** · 12-09-2005, 01:36

IIRC in D&D they always refer to the player as a “she”.

I’m Neutral Good

**GoreBag** · 12-09-2005, 01:48

Originally Posted by yesdachi

IIRC in D&D they always refer to the player as a “she”.

I’m Neutral Good

Only lately. In the previous edition (the one that wasn't broken...), there was a preface addressing the use of the male pronoun throughout the book, citing, if I recall, "centuries of use have neutered the male pronoun".

Ah, crap, I'm quoting the manuals...

**Kralizec** · 12-09-2005, 02:01

Neutral here.

**Reverend Joe** · 12-09-2005, 03:25

Originally Posted by NeonGod

Only lately. In the previous edition (the one that wasn't broken...), there was a preface addressing the use of the male pronoun throughout the book, citing, if I recall, "centuries of use have neutered the male pronoun".

Ah, crap, I'm quoting the manuals...

Neon...

Smoke a joint, man. I am serious. Just once.