Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: MPs in well reasonably educated shock.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dyslexic agnostic insomniac Senior Member Goofball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia
    Posts
    4,211

    Default Re: MPs in well reasonably educated shock.

    Quote Originally Posted by King Henry V
    Yes, another Leftie windbag crying about how paying for anything better demonstrates a blow against equality and we shall all go to the same rubbish schools so that we will all be forced to suck on the government's teat for the rest of our lives and vote Labour...
    That's not what he is saying at all. You missed the important bit:

    Quote Originally Posted by The article
    The report concludes: "It is important to ensure the opportunity to attend these universities is open equally to all young people on the basis of merit. Previous work undertaken by the trust has suggested that this is not the case at present and that - relative to their A-level achievements - those from state schools, poorer neighbourhoods and lower social classes are underrepresented."
    I've boldfaced the important part.

    The implication is that even given equal academic qualifications, kids who are products of independent schools stand a better chance of attending Oxford/Cambridge than kids who are products of government schools.

    Now, this still leaves room for speculation an misinterpretation but it certainly is not what you were trying make it out to be.
    "What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"

    - TSM

  2. #2
    Bringing down the vulgaroisie Member King Henry V's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Don of Lon.
    Posts
    2,845

    Default Re: MPs in well reasonably educated shock.

    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball
    That's not what he is saying at all. You missed the important bit:



    I've boldfaced the important part.

    The implication is that even given equal academic qualifications, kids who are products of independent schools stand a better chance of attending Oxford/Cambridge than kids who are products of government schools.

    Now, this still leaves room for speculation an misinterpretation but it certainly is not what you were trying make it out to be.
    The article's main point is that paying for a better education (i.e being able to afford to go to good University such as Oxford or Cambridge) is a bad thing. The "positive" discrimination which Lefties love so much and what the government is doing is raising the entrance level for universities for those coming from independent schools and setting aside a large number of places only for those coming from state schools, and fining certain universities if they do not respect this.
    www.thechap.net
    "We were not born into this world to be happy, but to do our duty." Bismarck
    "You can't be a successful Dictator and design women's underclothing. One or the other. Not both." The Right Hon. Bertram Wilberforce Wooster
    "Man, being reasonable, must get drunk; the best of life is but intoxication" - Lord Byron
    "Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison." - C. S. Lewis

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO