Then your "contribution" to the thread is at an end.


The mere fact you have posted the above as you have demonstrates a base misunderstanding of the issue.

Not at all , there are questions to the legality of the actions that were undertaken .
The questionable actions have been described as mistakes and technical glitches .
Those questionable actions will be addressed by the inquiry, that is generally why there are such commitees , to check if the actions taken went beyond those that are allowed to be taken .
The issue is not past rulings as such , but whether the actions taken are in compliance with those rulings .

"Your driving example would be better if someone questioned whether Sheriff George had the authority to drive at night. After it was explained: "yes, his license does allow driving at night" to then find the questioner saying: "But, what if he were drunk?" To which, the reply would be: "evidence?""
To which the reply would be wait for the inquiry to view the evidence .

You claim that this is a mundane open and shut issue .
People in the AGs office and the Senate judicial commitee do not agree with you . Perhaps you have access to more information than they do .