Court Ruling: Intelligent Design Not Science

[Kralizec]

his will be overturned no doubt.. Not religion nor god nor ID was even mentioned nevermind taught by the boards ruling.

Boards don't teach anything. Boards determine what teachers should teach. In this case a board ordered that ID should be tought as an alternative to evolution in a scientific context.

Its was more like a disclaimer at the start of teaching something.

See above. You're probably confusing this with the sticker case, wich was a different case with the same subject.

Then of course there is also the credible claim that Darwin converted to christianity and renounced evolution as we see it today.

LINK

Good going, by presenting a google query as a supporting element for your argument

From one of the more suspiciously sounding sites on the first page:

It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.