Do we need eye-candy skins ?

[Mouzafphaerre]

.
10K limit seems to be too low for most people and playing the cop is tiresome indeed. I suggest a 100K limit instead. That would make all happy and won't lag on ADSL and higher.
.

[TosaInu]

You mean 100k for the normal sig Mouzafphaerre? The 10k limit for the current signatures is not subject to change at this moment.

Or do you mean 100k for the extra picture that can be displayed right below the signature and be viewed when a member wishes to view it?

[Mouzafphaerre]

.

The 10k limit for the current signatures is not subject to change at this moment.

That pretty much rests the case.
.

[TosaInu]

Not for the extra picture box Mouzafphaerre. Since that is an option for only an extra picture, narrowbanders don't have to suffer. In the meanwhile broadbanders who have enough hardware and like visuals, can use this.

Which limits do you propose for the extra box?

[Mikeus Caesar]

Testing this wonderful feature.

[LeftEyeNine]

...And my suggestion will be particularly on the sig limits. I'd like 50-60 kbs of sig filesize limits and a sig area of 300 pixels height restricted to a width of 700 pixels max.

[Reenk Roink]

It's fine as it is .

[Mouzafphaerre]

Not for the extra picture box Mouzafphaerre. Since that is an option for only an extra picture, narrowbanders don't have to suffer. In the meanwhile broadbanders who have enough hardware and like visuals, can use this.

Which limits do you propose for the extra box?

.
The same, 100K would be fine.
.

[TosaInu]

Copperhaired Berserker!, ian_of_smeg16, King Jim II, littlegannon, Mikeus Caesar and mongoose voted yes. So, your proposals for size please?

[Ianofsmeg16]

To be honest, i think i've changed my mind, eye candy skins would be great, just not fair to those who dont have the internet speed to cope..

GAH! keep it as it is