Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Armies not aggressive enough?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    1.5/1.6 providea a challenging A.I..

  2. #2
    Son of Gob. Member Jebus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Brugge, Belgium
    Posts
    211

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    AI not aggressive enough?

    In my current campaing as the Romans (209BC), I am at war with the Swéboz, Iberians, Getai, Epirus, Carthage, Makedonia, Ptolemaioi, and Koinon Hellenon. I'm already trying to fight a four-front war with the three armies I can afford - slaughtering on average four to five full stack armies each turn. If the AI were any more agressive, it would have to mean the Baktrians declaring war on me too.

    And we don't want that. It's already impossible for me to win as it is.
    Last edited by Jebus; 01-05-2006 at 15:33.
    Je ne vois qu'infini par toutes les fenêtres.

    Charles Baudelaire, Les Fleurs du Mal

  3. #3

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    Well I've not seen that much aggressiveness by the AI vs other AI nations, but boy they sure are aggressive vs you....
    Friendship, Fun & Honour!

    "The Prussian army always attacks."
    -Frederick the Great

  4. #4
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    It hasn't been real agressive against me yet, but I have presented a formidable target as the Romans.

    Also, play with campaign map difficulty set to Very Hard.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member Reenk Roink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,353

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    I am noticing that the AI likes to break off sieges a lot...

    but I guess that's hardcoded...

  6. #6
    Member Member Nagarythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Malaga, Spain
    Posts
    15

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    I've also found that AI loves to starve towns instead of attacking them. It slows them a lot in conquering new territories. But even considering this, I find the AI good in expansionistic terms, at least the celtic factions. I've played with casse and sweboz, and in both campaigns aedui and arverni had conquered near all france before I arrive (and I arrive very soon, 265 as casse and 267 as sweboz), so I don't see problems with AI expanding, at least for now.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    ok, i didnt click the post button this many times...i swear.
    Last edited by GeneticFlea; 01-05-2006 at 23:48.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jebus
    In my current campaing as the Romans (209BC), I am at war with the Swéboz, Iberians, Getai, Epirus, Carthage, Makedonia, Ptolemaioi, and Koinon Hellenon. ....It's already impossible for me to win as it is.
    Here, here! That reminds me of a great RTR Roman VH campaign I had. Somehow I got into lots of fights I could never fully finish.

    I have not got as far as you in my EB Roman campaign. It's around 248BC and I've been attacked by Epirus, Carthage, Greece and the Averni. I have decided to wipe out offending enemy factions remorsely as I think it will be much tougher than RTR to take on all comers. (Partly it was exasperation with Epirus buying up my towns!). Epirus is now gone, Carthage city has fallen and the Greeks have been expelled from their mainland.

    But some of the fights have been tough - I only won Sparta thanks to my general's cavalry wiping out multiple Greek units after the rest of my army had been routed. [It was fun but I now agree with Qwerty that general's units need weakening - maybe they should be like royal knights in MTW; about 20 strong with IIRC only 1HP?]

  9. #9
    Member Member Iskandr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Tempe
    Posts
    37

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    I have also seen this a lot- huge AI stacks glaring at each other with little or no actual fighting, while I get spammed turn after turn with armies. I really hope patching to 1.5/1.6 fixes this.

    Iskandr

  10. #10

    Default Re: Armies not aggressive enough?

    This may seem like a bit of a silly question, but if you choose" hard mode" what exactly is "harder"

    Is it that your enemies become unrealistically tough, as in they simply wont die as quickly as they normally would, or does the artificial intelligence just work harder?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO