Geting the Idea?

[Ludens]

I mean the agreement was Not to POST.
Also i had been told to PM people replys, so i dont see how that implys that im not allowed to enter the front room.

The agreement was not to post in the frontroom in order to keep to the peace. You have obeyed the letter while completely ignoring the spirit.

This the third time since that affair that you complain about Beirut, the moderator you are supposed to leave alone. I agree that there was a lot of petty abuse directed at you in the previous threads, but on the other hand: you broke the rules, were allowed to return on the condition that you kept the peace, and seek Beirut out again. And again. And again. What are the members (or the forum staff for that matter) supposed to think? You are creating completely the wrong impression.

I still believe you intend well, but you choose to take issue when you are not allowed to. It is not your job nor, given your previous actions, your right to comment on Beirut's behaviour as a moderator. There are plenty of frontroomers who will compain if there was a serious offense. I don't know the particulars of this case, but I doubt anyone was offended by it. Beirut is a respected member and a good moderator.

My advice, if you will take it, is to drop it. Complaining about Beirut will only stir up anger amongst patrons and staff who feel you have been let of lightly and that you are trying to take advantage of that by having another go at Beirut.