SureReally Gawain , and do you have any facts to back up that assumption ?
Look at this one
That represents much more than a fringe element. Show me another religion in which over 30 percent of them support terrorism.
SureReally Gawain , and do you have any facts to back up that assumption ?
Look at this one
That represents much more than a fringe element. Show me another religion in which over 30 percent of them support terrorism.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Eh? Actually, the largest concentration of Muslims is in Dearborn, MI which isn't to far from my house. I have yet to met an Islamic terrorist, or I think.Originally Posted by Tribesman
Well most if not all the Muslims Ive met here are also very nice people. But then I doubt they will go running around town yelling for a Jihad and screamong death to America even if they felt that way. Again the title of this thread is silly. No one thinks being Muslim makes you a terrorist. Its just at this moment most of the terrorism in the world is being done by Muslims. Hopefully its time will pass.Eh? Actually, the largest concentration of Muslims is in Dearborn, MI which isn't to far from my house. I have yet to met an Islamic terrorist, or I think.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Here's my problems with that Gaiwan.
First, this is support for terrorism, the "official" terrorist organization list says that 1/5 of terrorist in terrorist groups are muslims, proportionally around or a bit lower than the worldwide muslim population.
Second, the second poll is quite out of place. The suicide bombing issue is a complex one. The majority of muslim clerics say that it is forbidden as suicide is forbidden. A minority say that it is not technically suicide (as in trying to escape the problems of life) so it is allowed against military targets. The sparse handful that support the al-Qaeda doctrine say it is ok to kill civilians as well.
The first poll can be reversed on the "collateral damage" doctrine. Say if Americans were asked, "is it ok to kill civilians in war by airstrikes or missle attacks in large cities where innocents are certain to be hit?"
Or take a classic example: "was it ok to bomb the largely civilian targets of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to avoid a full scale invasion of Japan?"
That's a logical comparison but there are fundamental differences. If "priority #1 target has purposely put themselves in a civilian area what is the military supposed to do?Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
And in the case of the original poll civilians are specifically being targeted.
That I have more issue with. I say no, it was not OK. More effort should have been made to "prove the point" if you will, through means that do not directly involve civilian deaths.Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Hmm, the poll is retardedly worded, IMO. It's probable that a degree of response bias is evident. The "Violence against civilians" is vague, but the real problem lies in the "defense of Islam." Obviously that adds a degree of threat and defensiveness to the individual who is polled.
I recall that in my Statistics class (my final is tommorow![]()
![]()
) we were shown a real life example of two polls in the same region concerning a tax raise. One was worded specially with "for more school revenue" while the other simply gave the rate of increase. Of course, the percentages in favor were 54% and 17% respectively...
No
Remember the suicide bomber vest was invented by the Tamil Tigers who are primarily Marxist. Remember Red Army Faction, Baader-Meinhorf, and a slew of others? Right now there are terrorist groups everywhere, of every race, color, creed, and persuation. In Ireland there are Catholic and Protestant, in Spain, Basque, in Greece, Anarchists, in Sri Lanka, Tamils...
Sometimes I slumber on a bed of roses
Sometimes I crash in the weeds
One day a bowl full of cherries
One night I'm suckin' on lemons and spittin' out the seeds
-Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers, Lemons
So I ask Really Gawain , and do you have any facts to back up that assumption ?
And I get what ?
A Sure
and a
Look at this one
Really Gawain , surely even you can do better than that .
May I ask you if you are familiar with a recent post where someone dismisses opinion polls as factual evidence as they can be manipulated to ensure the desired result .
The person who made that post goes under the name of Gawain on these forums , have you ever heard of him ?![]()
But since you are obviously unfamiliar with Gawains thoughts on opinion polls Gawain can we examine the "facts" you have put forward ?
For starters what is the source ?
Secondly what was the precise wording for each of the questions asked on each occasion and what was the exact wording of each of the possible responses ?
Thirdly how were the results of those responses seperated into just two categories?
Lastly and most importantly , where are the results for non-muslim respondants and why were they removed so as to only show Muslim respondants ?
It does seem to me that you are just putting out bull that fits with your preconcieved notions despite the fact that your notions are factually completely false .
Eh? Actually, the largest concentration of Muslims is in Dearborn, MI which isn't to far from my house. I have yet to met an Islamic terrorist, or I think.
Thats weird Ghost , since the Michigan based terrorist groups that your government lists appear to be very non-muslim oriented . It appears that you have a strange fixation with Muslims and a weak grasp on facts .
Nm.
Last edited by Goofball; 01-11-2006 at 19:00.
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
Dunno, most terrorists are muslims; I will think no further then a simple correlation, I couldn't care less about what they believe as long as they don't do the boom thing, so I say yes. Maybe there have been other groups with other ideals, but currently Islam is entirely the bomb. If it isn't, they sure have a hard time showing it.
I know at least five whose innocence I can personally vouch for. Hold on, make that six...Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
![]()
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
Chill, Tribesman, I must have misunderstood your intial response. I do not have a problem with the ordinary Muslim (My lab partner is bio is a Muslim for God's sake so don't start that shit). Now that I understand exactly what you mean, I will comment.Originally Posted by Tribesman
[B
Michigan based terror groups? That is almost laughable. No offense, but I don't see to many newspaper or new topics that have to do with a Michigan Terrorist groups ramming a truck full of explosives into a building or decapitating other human beings.
If you are thinking of the Michigan Militia, terrorist group might be too strong of a word...they are wackos though IMO.
You know, I looked up one of those odd American law-enforcement mags our local well-equipped bookstore carries a while back. They had an article about domestic American terrorism (as well as one about how the Adminstration's "security" policies are turning the country into a "snitch nation" à la good old DDR...) - and that was all about militant eco-nuts who are apparently a bit of an issue there judging by the anecdotes in the article.
That aside, how about the abortion-clinic bombers and the crazy right-wing extremists ? How have they been lately ?
And I would also be rather interested in the logic behind the statement "most terrorists are Muslims at the moment", as I for one have never even heard of anything even hinting in that direction. And Gawain's polls can stuff it; for a comparision Finnish polls show that the welfare state is extremely popular among the populace, but that doesn't keep them from voting centre-right in the elections... And for another comparision, how would one by same criteria read the results of a poll conducted among Americans about torture if it turned out a substantial portion approved of it conditionally (say, "in defense of Liberty" or however these things now usually get sugar-coated) ?
"Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."
-Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
If you are thinking of the Michigan Militia, terrorist group might be too strong of a word...
The Michigan Militia are not on the list , the only mention of it is that some of its members are linked to the 3rd Continental Congress which is on the list .
Yes I have . But you post polls so I thought you believed in them. You asked for evidence. Thats quite different from proof.May I ask you if you are familiar with a recent post where someone dismisses opinion polls as factual evidence as they can be manipulated to ensure the desired result .
The person who made that post goes under the name of Gawain on these forums , have you ever heard of him
What percentage of Muslims would you venture support terrorism against Israel? Also were those Jews dancing in the streets in the Middle Rast on 911? Can you find a christian or jewish equivolant today? You can try to deny that most of the terrorists in the world today are not Muslim but Ive yet to see any proof of this or of most of all the other tribesman tripe you post.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
I seem to remember a guy by the name of McVeigh, but that's probably a Muslim name, dropped the a- when he came to the states. The reason they aren't in the papers is that they're not high profile and they kill fewer people.Michigan based terror groups? That is almost laughable. No offense, but I don't see to many newspaper or new topics that have to do with a Michigan Terrorist groups ramming a truck full of explosives into a building or decapitating other human beings.
Sometimes I slumber on a bed of roses
Sometimes I crash in the weeds
One day a bowl full of cherries
One night I'm suckin' on lemons and spittin' out the seeds
-Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers, Lemons
Yes, THe Oklahoma City bombings... let's try something new for a change.Originally Posted by JimBob
Originally Posted by Papewaio
HA.![]()
You were wrongIt was Actualy Me Who was posting not trish.
Although Trish Posted in the 12 month old baby rape thread.
I Had to Sit out of that 1 Incase I Went balsitic, And trying to get them killed.
But Any way.
I think you should have Relized it was me.
Simply due to the way i structure my posts.
there always prety similar in structure.
Im a firm belever that Bite sized manageable Chunks of text Are more likley to be read.
Thats why my posts Look like this.
But Just to Re state my Last Point.
"How can any 1 Say most terrorists are msulim If You dont know EXACTLY howmany terrorists there Are"
And Although Mebion glyn dwr never killed any 1 they were A terrorist Group never the less.
The question Is NOT, Do muslim terrorists kill more People than any terrorists of any other religion?.
Neither is the Question, Are Muslims Terrorists the most telivized Terrorists on tv?.
The question Is Does Being Muslim make you a terrorist.
And the answer to that IS blaitantly NO,
![]()
A Welsh mum screwd up my Texan vocabulary for years to come. My earliest memories of grade school are "whats a rubbish" or "your mum?" In a Texas drawl that dosent sound purrdy
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Actually ShambleS the majority of your posts are hard to understand and hence hard to read and hard to take seriously. Just like SFTS and myself have poor post structure... I use ... all the time. I assume all 3 of us have Welsh mums btw so maybe we can blame them for our poor grammar and spelling.![]()
Last edited by Papewaio; 01-12-2006 at 02:27.
Originally Posted by strike for the south
Whats A rubbis hamkes no sence at all lol.
What a load of rubish.. Prehaps..
And us welsh say Mam. not mum or mom.
P.S
Mam is not a shortend word In welsh,
Thats the welsh word for Mother..
Like Mamgu for Grandmother... but when speaking English (and I haven't used Welsh since before I was 5) I use the English term mom.
I never used Welsh..Im proud of my welshness despite that fact that my mum is really american. Welsh but no language
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Originally Posted by Papewaio
Lol well I understand what I say Just fine.
I do have a Punctuation problem though,
And I tend to capitalize the 1st letter of Any word I would put emphasis on in a real life conversation...
Thats why some times my posts thend to have capital letters in the middle of the although they arent punctuated.
I supose this could lead some to imagine that i just missed the full stop.
And that would create reading dificultys.
Also a nother problem of mine is that i type to fast, And often hit incorrect keys, (I really miss my edit button lol)
As for my mother.
She works for the goverment, so shes prety good with grammer.
![]()
But your Texan...Originally Posted by strike for the south
![]()
I cant explain it its muddled in a whole bunch of ship rides in the 18 and 1900s![]()
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Most Americans are going to be an descendent of an import or two.
I always wondered how many people from Texas had ancestors who lived in the Republic of Texas...Originally Posted by strike for the south
Yes I have . But you post polls so I thought you believed in them.
Really gawain ? I rarely even post links , can you find an example of me posting a poll ?
Or are you thinking of the Isreali Defense Force statistics on terrorism that I posted to make complete nonsense of one of your earlier claims about terrorism , thats not really a poll is it , and surely any bias from those statistics should have been in your favour , if you had bothered to actually use facts to support your position.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You can try to deny that most of the terrorists in the world today are not Muslim but Ive yet to see any proof of this or of most of all the other tribesman tripe you post.
Gawain have you made a mistake there ? The whole point is that most of the terrorists in the world are not Muslim , that is a simple fact . It is you who is denying that that is the truth .![]()
What percentage of Muslims would you venture support terrorism against Israel?
What percentage of non muslims would you venture support the Palestinian cause ?
Also were those Jews dancing in the streets in the Middle Rast on 911? Can you find a christian or jewish equivolant today?
Have you examined your governments proscribed terrorist organisations list ?
You may or may not be surprised that the second most numerous and dangerous of the domestic groups was the JDL which has its origins not far away from yourself in Brooklyn , oh the Jewish terrorists came second the the Puerto Ricans , which was a surprise as I expected the Cubans to top the list .
As you work through the list , surprise surprise it is full of groups who describe themselves as Christian .![]()
Now you may be familiar with a rather well known Christian fruitcake who has a large televised ministry over there , while he may not have been dancing through the middle east (in fact after yesterdays statement from Israel he is not even welcome over there) , but he did celebrate 9/11 as Gods punishment for the wickedness of New Yorkers !!!!!
Bookmarks