Closing Backroom threads because?

**Devastatin Dave** · 01-13-2006, 19:13

They are normally closed due to personnal attacks and such, but now they are closed when people are "Ok - it's probably best to close that one while we have a peaceful group-hugging phase"?
Not a direct criticism towards you Ser, but isn't the discussion still relevant? Again, not trying to make any conflict just wanted this addressed out in the open.
Man, I get a lot of threads closed!!! LOL

**Redleg** · 01-13-2006, 19:14

You will probably find this one closed also....

**Devastatin Dave** · 01-13-2006, 19:16

Originally Posted by Redleg

You will probably find this one closed also....

Well atleast my post count will go up!!!

hooray!!!

**Ser Clegane** · 01-13-2006, 19:17

Just for clarification - I did not close the thread because of the last couple of posts.

I think the thread was indeed meant to bait (the original post showed no intent to actually start a serious discussion).

My group-hugging remark was just meant to say that it's probably nicer to close this thread with some positive post than with some people going at each other's throats.

**Devastatin Dave** · 01-13-2006, 19:22

Thanks for the quick and informative response, clear and to the point. And in order to not disappoint Mr Redleg's prediction of this thread closure...

SPAM!!!!

**Just A Girl** · 01-13-2006, 19:24

Did i miss something in the last thread?

Where was the cristian bashing??
r am i just to thick skinned to notice it?

**Fragony** · 01-13-2006, 19:25

Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave

..

SPAM!!!!

Ha! I rule!

I SPAM

**Devastatin Dave** · 01-13-2006, 19:31

Originally Posted by Fragony

Ha! I rule!

I SPAM

spam!!!

**Ser Clegane** · 01-13-2006, 20:35

Originally Posted by Just A Girl

Did i miss something in the last thread?

Where was the cristian bashing??
r am i just to thick skinned to notice it?

There was no bashing - but the thread could be easily interpreted as baiting (even if I would assume that it was not meant to bait) - and a discussion did not seem to be the intent of the post.

I thinks this thread also served its purpose ... so