dropping rocks...ridiculous things in battle

[matteus the inbred]

Playing as the Byzantines, I recently managed to kill a Sicilian king during a fight for Naples by dropping a catapult stone on his head...lucky me, i thought.
Last night, the French invaded Naples as well, with a jaw-dropping (by my standards anyway...) 7,500 men. Ah well, says I, i never liked Naples much anyway. Too hot.
My 800-odd Byzantines did have the significant advantage of being led by a 9-star Jedi Master with the Field Defence Specialist virtue, and no unit had a valour rating of less than 5, but even so, fatigue would surely win eventually.

Found a nice hill to sit on, lined up my 4 catapults, unfurled the Curious Purple Standard of Byzantium and passed round the pre-fight humous. Catapults are a battlefield affectation of mine that i can't get rid of, people say they're a bit rubbish, you'd be better off bringing more archers or something. Sure enough, vast hordes of French poured on...handily marching in column. Since my artillery was all valour 5, their first volley was dead on. And their second. And nearly all subsequent volleys too. Horrid carnage among the tight-packed French, feudal sergeants lying squashed everywhere, yet still they advance.
It looks grim...i'm going to have my armour all dirty and everything, maybe even use some arrows. And then...'the enemy king has been slain!' growls Sean Pertwee's voice. They've done it again! All glory to the rock-chucking guys.

The rest of the battle was a succession of routs that went on and on and on...final enemy casualties; 1129 killed, 3133 captured. My own casualties were a laughable 153 dead, and my two Pronoi Allaigion captured over 700 enemy apiece.
Now, this isn't intended as a 'I'm great, look what i did' piece...low morale armies, once the leader is dead and the first wave seen off, are not really difficult to chase off if your troops are fresh. The sheer scale of the French effort, the crushing ease of their defeat and most of all the joy of artillery taking out the enemy king with a big rock on the head for the second straight battle just struck me as worth writing about...I'd love to hear about battles of similar ridiculousness. apologies for the length of this post!

[Just A Girl]

Thats why i dont like to use catapult things.
They tend to make the game a bit to easy cos the AI Really dosent understand its dying when its being hit by ranged units.

This is even More true with NTW.
With the 1st Cannon you can build bing a HIGHLY mobile howitzer.
That thing can moove like any other unit, so no worrys about needing to Make sure you have it pointing the right way.
It alos Showers about 5 bolders on to the selected unit from A Really impressive distance,
And even when its a totaly basic off the shelf moddle. Its near enough 100% accurate.

I really beleve the AI is Oblivious to Atilary attacks,

For instance in NTW. i simply build 3 howitzers. a couple of mounted horse rifle guys.
and a few infantry units 2 or so.

And thats basically all you need to Win the game.

No matter Howmany enemy units arive on the battel feild, So long as My howitzers are As far away from them as i can be and Still hit them
They will all die.

And Attacking the AI is even worse,
Remember I said there oblivious to atilary attacks?
This is why i say that.

the Ai Are defening and i arive with my 3 howitzers 2 infantry units and 2 horse units,
I set up my howitzers Place my infantry infront of them.
and my horses on there flanks.

I then tell 1 howitzer to target the front most central columb of hostile units.
And the other 2 the ones farther out on either flank

Then you sit and wat there numbers.

100.. (5 rocks bouce about) 80.... (5 rocks bounce about) 63,, (another volley) 48....
And they jsut stand there as Each and every unit is decimated by either direct hits or bouncing bolders.

That kind of makes it a bit Easy.
so i tend not to use atilary any more.

[matteus the inbred]

wow, that sounds like fun!
to be honest, i though people disliked artillery for its battlefield ineffectiveness and tactical inflexibility, not cos the AI doesn't know what to do about it...i assume NTW is the Napoleonic mod? this thing could happen in that period, troops would stand in formation for hours under heavy bombardment. the AI might be dumb, but real historical generals have often been even dumberer (?). or even dumber, maybe.

i experimented with organ guns in a custom battle the other day...6 against 600 pikemen..end result, a lot of dead pikemen! still, cavalry would've minced me and who the hell's gonna field 6 organ guns?

[econ21]

Um, I dropped a rock on the Pope's head once, which was certainly memorable. But it is fairly rare (only happened once to me that I recall). I used to like catapults for the "shock and awe" factor (even more so with firey onagers in RTW) - they certainly seem impressive. But when I look at the post-battle casualties they often kill very modest numbers - far less than a vanilla unit of archers in my SP games. I've heard they get much better with high valour generals, so that may be a factor.

[matteus the inbred]

I've heard they get much better with high valour generals, so that may be a factor.

this is most definitely the case...i really only use them with Byzantines cos they have generals who give huge valour bonuses, which makes them astonishingly accurate. i think my 4 killed around 40-50 guys each before running out of ammo, a similar return to a unit of archers (although archers, particularly the Trebizond archers i had, can obviously scrap much better). in sieges under low valour generals artillery can be the most frustrating thing ever, as it can repeatedly miss a large and obviously somewhat stationary castle...

[Ironside]

I've heard they get much better with high valour generals, so that may be a factor.

Doesn't seem to help that much. Catapults led by 9 star generals miss quite alot. Combat valour on the other hand.

Starting the battle with 10 culverins pounding on the enemy is great fun anyway.

[Evil_Maniac From Mars]

Reminds me of the time I killed the leader of the Golden Horde with a single cannonball from a tower of my castle, after he died I sallied out against his 10000, outnumbered 2:1, and managed to rout them. Not suprising though really, seeing as these were hardened troops from the Polish, Hungarian, and Byzantine campaigns, and I don't think the Mongols had quite so much valour as them.

[Just A Girl]

wow, that sounds like fun!

Oh il admit The 1st time I used them.
I was giggeling like a little school girl, And was Extreamly pleased that the 1st volley had done so much damage (lucky hit i thought)
second Was just as acurate
so was the 3rd
Even if the ai are marching Quicky They dont miss.
So the novelty soon wore off.

And yes NTW is napolionic Total war.

Its A great mod,
I rate it at 9/10

would have had 10 out of 10 but its a Little bit easy Even with the time limit.
Also The time limit prevents you playing a nice casual game of camp and build,
So it forces you in to Playing agressivly.

[HopAlongBunny]

My favorite memory of artillery on the battlefield has to be blasting my general with a culvern

[matteus the inbred]

your General? whoops.

perhaps it was a classic management 'and what does this button (or fuse, if you will) do' moment...
or 'no, no, Sire, don't stand THERE...<BANG>'

[Odin]

Catapults are a battlefield affectation of mine that i can't get rid of, people say they're a bit rubbish, you'd be better off bringing more archers or something.

Although my passion for catapults dosent seem to be as strong as yours I seem to find a place for them in my armies on a regular basis.

Particularly when defending, there is nothing quite like sitting on a hill lobbing rocks at people far away and knocking them off. A guilty pleasure perhaps, but its fun to watch, particularly the Naptha catapults.

[matteus the inbred]

A guilty pleasure perhaps, but its fun to watch

exactly. i'm a sucker for stuff like that. lining up spears and archers and then sitting on my arse waiting for the enemy to get there is so dull sometimes!

Catapults are really good for general/king killing as the rocks seem magnetically attracted to them.

weird but true. that's 2 out 2 battles where rock meets general. i'd have got the French general in a third battle as well, but he took an arrow first...good way to get around their multiple lives/jedi status. the only historical example i can think of was Simon de Montfort the Elder, who had a terminal encounter with a big rock during the siege of Toulouse...

also works well in VI against hordes of Irish, as they seem to approach in depth, kerns/bonnachts in front then gallows and spears. can get a lot of kills on the bounce, so to speak...

[antisocialmunky]

exactly. i'm a sucker for stuff like that. lining up spears and archers and then sitting on my arse waiting for the enemy to get there is so dull sometimes!



weird but true. that's 2 out 2 battles where rock meets general. i'd have got the French general in a third battle as well, but he took an arrow first...good way to get around their multiple lives/jedi status. the only historical example i can think of was Simon de Montfort the Elder, who had a terminal encounter with a big rock during the siege of Toulouse...

also works well in VI against hordes of Irish, as they seem to approach in depth, kerns/bonnachts in front then gallows and spears. can get a lot of kills on the bounce, so to speak...

I've named it the Jedi Attraction Postulate and it states that Jedism's warping of 'da force' causes large flying objects to alter their trajectory to bend into the spacial curvature around said jedi.

[Martok]

I've named it the Jedi Attraction Postulate and it states that Jedism's warping of 'da force' causes large flying objects to alter their trajectory to bend into the spacial curvature around said jedi.

Good one, ASM.

But yeah, it's pretty thoroughly documented that artillery crews have an absolutely uncanny ability to knock off generals--both the enemy's and your own. At least this phenomenon doesn't discriminate, as it seems to happen to the AI as often as it does to us!

[matteus the inbred]

I've named it the Jedi Attraction Postulate and it states that Jedism's warping of 'da force' causes large flying objects to alter their trajectory to bend into the spacial curvature around said jedi.

roflmao
brilliant!

James II in 1460 during the seige of Roxburgh

thanks Ajax, i can never remember which one blew himself up and which one died at Flodden.

i prefer to keep my general away from ballistas...they appear to be useless for anything except neatly turning him into a kebab wrapped in expensive tinfoil...

[Ludens]

I've named it the Jedi Attraction Postulate and it states that Jedism's warping of 'da force' causes large flying objects to alter their trajectory to bend into the spacial curvature around said jedi.

. I heard there is a bug in the accuracy calculation that made catapults as accurate against generals as they are against walls. Cannot confirm it though, other than that artillery does seem to have a propensity to hit the general.

While we are on the subject: is there any one that uses trebuchets/mangonels? I find them far less useful than catapults. Yes, they do more damage but they seem unable to reliably hit anything, even a caste wall. Ballistas are even worse: no accuracy and almost no damage when they do hit. Never even managed to hit the enemy general with it either (but they did once kill my own general ). Can anyone provide some pointers to using them or should I just go for catapults?

[CosmoSteve]

I believe that trebuchets and mangonels have a longer range than catapults, so they are useful when fighting against more advanced castles, especially if those castles have ballista/catapult towers that could destroy a close range catapult.

[antisocialmunky]

. I heard there is a bug in the accuracy calculation that made catapults as accurate against generals as they are against walls. Cannot confirm it though, other than that artillery does seem to have a propensity to hit the general.

While we are on the subject: is there any one that uses trebuchets/mangonels? I find them far less useful than catapults. Yes, they do more damage but they seem unable to reliably hit anything, even a caste wall. Ballistas are even worse: no accuracy and almost no damage when they do hit. Never even managed to hit the enemy general with it either (but they did once kill my own general ). Can anyone provide some pointers to using them or should I just go for catapults?

I always thought it was a feature. Its one of their only redeeming field battle features. Being able to literally lock onto enemy generals and 1 hit KO him is sweetness.

[matteus the inbred]

While we are on the subject: is there any one that uses trebuchets/mangonels? I find them far less useful than catapults.

well, naturally I use them!! catapults are fine for battles; they're fairly cheap, they have enough range, decent accuracy if their total valour is about 3 or more, and i don't think the bigger siege weapons do more damage against troops. ballistas are rubbish, period.
the bigger ones are siege weapons only, really...they can't turn, they use more crew. but, they can chuck stuff at walls from further away than the defenders can fire, even if they are pretty inaccurate. i usually hire them as mercs anyway, can't be bothered to tech up to them. i did once field 4 or 5 trebs against someone in VI, but catapults would have done just as well.

as a postscriptum to this, i think bridge battles are the siege weapon's best battlefield opportunity. whether in attack or defence, you are essentially firing at an enemy who can't manouevre out of your fire arc and will probably be deployed in depth. i have caused very heavy casualties with just one low valour siege weapon, and the psychological factor is so important in bridge battles. i usually keep a couple of catapults in provinces where i can defend rivers.

[Lanemerkel1]

I just played a custom battle where I was playing the Swiss with the Pope, Italy, and HRE as my allies, French, English, Spanish, and Byzantines as my enemies.


each faction had the same army same men same units and same bonus level

10 Arquebusier Units per army (each armies general having full valour weapons and armour)
6 Culverin Units per Army


I killed the byzantine and French generals whom I was facing at the time right off the bat, the Germans killed off the Spanish General, and I got over to that side of the field in time to help out in 24 gun crushing of the English general




I have to give props to the English though, even though they took the brunt of my allied force they stayed in the battle the longest.

[Evil Eddie]

I dont bother with balistas (total waste of money) and all other non-gun powder seige engines except for catapults, which can turn so makes them far more effect in tracking enemy movements.

Nothing better than being on a flat landscape watching an enemy army march towards you while your cannons blast nice clear pathways through their units. Hopefully by the time they get close you have used most of your ammo and you can retire you artillery units for some reserves.

[Zain]

Lately I've tried a new thing and have modded my Longbowmen. Now, they are like the best Snipers ever trained in the Universe!!! I backed up my army far back on the field (it's all perfectly flat) and used my awesome Longbowmen. They shot down the French King in the first wave of shots, and this was definently longer range than any weapon I had ever seen. Anyway, we shot down their King from one side of the map to the other, and while their army tried to get to us, we killed off every single one of them. Game end, 2,360 killed, 0 lost.

-ZainDustin

[cegman]

I guess I never use them to target the general but I can see why historically they weren't used. But they are so good at taking out morale that I almost have to use them.