In 280BC, we have no evidence that a tribe called Casse existed. It is only in the mid-1st century that their existence can be confirmed.

Now please note I don’t have any problem with their inclusion, as after all how else is playing a group based in the Isles in the early 3rd century BC going to be represented through the medium of a strategic computer game? There is a limit of the number of factions that can be represented and a choice had to be made on how 3rd century BC Britain was represented and what name the faction would be given.

Rather my question is will there be a recognition that some elements of the game are based on conjecture due to the constraints of the evidence? For example through a short piece at the end of the faction description talking about the historical evidence behind the inclusion of Casse, its limitations and why it was chosen?

After all there will be a lot of people playing this game talking about the existence of a tribe called the Casse in the early 3rd century BC as if this was a proven historical fact. This kind of information would be excellent in providing gamers with the evidence behind the faction, particularly if they wanted to find out more.