Umm, in 1951 Fred Hoyle was pushing a steady state theory, and absolutely key evidence for the big bang (eg the cosmic background radiation) had not even been discovered (and wouldn't be until 1965). If they can't come up with something better than that...

More fundamentally I refuse to engage with sites that argue thus: If I can find one issue which your model does not explain, then your model is wrong, and my model wins by default.

On the other hand people who find problems with models AND put forward their own model which has fewer problems have my full attention.