12 week old baby raped

[The Blind King of Bohemia]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/b...ts/4599524.stm

This is just beyond belief. The woman only got five years for her part in the crime but i hope and pray they don't even see a week in jail before some kind criminal person tears their throat out with a blade or at very least puts them in a coma after a stairwell nonce bashing

[Marcellus]

Horrible. Absolutely horrible. I agree that five years does seem a bit short.

[Viking]

Not shocking, I`m afraid. This happens at all ages, and it`s probably a hell lot of equally ugly cases not discovered.

[Ice]

I'd give him the death penalty. She should get life in prison.

[Devastatin Dave]

The human condition is in a horrible state. These people are lower than the lowest of life forms the creep, crawl, or slime across the face of this earth. I weep for mankind.

[Rodion Romanovich]

Horrible, they both deserve 30 years in prison!

[Taffy_is_a_Taff]

how the hell do you rape a 12 week old baby?

why the hell would you rape a 12 week old baby?

[Ianofsmeg16]

Death would be too good for these monsters, let them pick up the soap until they're rotting and feeble, then i would hope that somebody puts a knife in their backs while they sleep.

[Rodion Romanovich]

In south Africa baby rape has happened a lot because of the "having sex with a virgin cures AIDS" myth. In England, I don't know of any such myths or similar. Hopefully it's just the news exaggerating something that wasn't a full rape but just a making of a very sick video that would look like rape despite not being it. But if it really was a rape... Then I don't understand how anyone could get the idea... They would make quite interesting subjects to psychology research.

[Viking]

how the hell do you rape a 12 week old baby?

why the hell would you rape a 12 week old baby?

Please, don`t allow me to answer..

[Reenk Roink]

*vomits*

[Don Corleone]

I must not be understanding the article properly...

He: guilty of 1 count of rape, 4 counts of indecency, et. al.

She: guilty of 4 counts of rape, 5 counts of indecency et. al.

He: Life in prison

She: 5 years?

I agree he should spend the rest of his natural life in a septic tank, but if she's guilty of even more offenses than him, why is she only getting 5 years?

[Ianofsmeg16]

I must not be understanding the article properly...

He: guilty of 1 count of rape, 4 counts of indecency, et. al.

She: guilty of 4 counts of rape, 5 counts of indecency et. al.

He: Life in prison

She: 5 years?

I agree he should spend the rest of his natural life in a septic tank, but if she's guilty of even more offenses than him, why is she only getting 5 years?

If someone says womens rights i will cry...
I agree it sounds stupid, but 25 years still isnt enough please refer to my earlier post for what should happen to these bastards!

[Marcellus]

I agree he should spend the rest of his natural life in a septic tank, but if she's guilty of even more offenses than him, why is she only getting 5 years?

This is the reason the judge seems to give for the difference in sentences:

'Malign influence'

Sentencing French, he said: "You did not shrink away from the acts in which you joined, but looked forward to them."

But he said French was also a victim and had come under Webster's "malign influence" and was to some extent "corrupted by him".

[Don Corleone]

Pardon my Latin, but that's . Unless he was found to have put a gun to her head to participate in these acts, she holds every bit as much responsibility as he does.

[Xiahou]

This is the reason the judge seems to give for the difference in sentences:

Right, so even though she "looked forward" to the crimes, she was influenced by the man to do so and therefore is only like 1/10 as culpable? Sounds like a huge double standard to me.

[Marcellus]

Right, so even though she "looked forward" to the crimes, she was influenced by the man to do so and therefore is only like 1/10 as culpable? Sounds like a huge double standard to me.

I completely agree. Unless she was forced into it (which seems unlikely considering the words of the judge: 'You [the woman] did not shrink away from the acts in which you joined, but looked forward to them.'), she should not have participated in such heinous crimes, whether she was influenced to do so by her boyfriend or not.

[Sartaq]

This entire ordeal from the crime to the sentencing makes me sick...

[Templar Knight]

[Alexanderofmacedon]

Horrible, they both deserve 30 years in prison!

Life...

[Just A Girl]

i think she should have gotten a life sentance also she is of an age that she should know right from wrong theres NO EXCUSE for her conduct i cant even begin to comprehend how people can do something so...so.... i cant even find the words to express how terrible their actions were oh, this is the real Just A Girl btw

[Lazul]

Slave labour, 12 hours per day, for the rest of life.

[Alexanderofmacedon]

If I were the babies dad, I'd pay a man to rape them everyday for the rest of there lives...

[Just A Girl]

If I were the babies dad, I'd pay a man to rape them everyday for the rest of there lives...


naaa that would be too good for them they'd prolly love it

[Ice]

Pardon my Latin, but that's . Unless he was found to have put a gun to her head to participate in these acts, she holds every bit as much responsibility as he does.

That is horseshit. Life atleast for both. ATLEAST.

Edit: I meant the ruling was horseshit, not you, Don.

[Alexanderofmacedon]

If I were the babies dad, I'd pay a man to rape them everyday for the rest of there lives...


naaa that would be too good for them they'd prolly love it

I would say something in response to that, but it's not appropriate...

[Soulforged]

visited her home after finding photographs detailing the abuse at Webster's home.

Does anyone knows how the detectives found those pictures? I mean how they entered the house? By any chance.
About the crime, it's dispicable, beyond that I think that psicological problems most be the motive.
About the sentence: it doesn't separetes between material author and instigator, but if the instegator was the man and the material author the woman, then the sentences should be inversed (the harsh one for the woman and the soft one for the man).

[Oaty]

Does anyone knows how the detectives found those pictures? I mean how they entered the house? By any chance.
.

International law enforcers alerted police after Webster downloaded 7,000 indecent images from the internet.

It appears the internet was to be used for distribution or already was being used.

[Strike For The South]

He dosent deserve the needle. cut off a finger each day then toes then the happy place before we put him in a room where we slowly suck the oxygen out. Yay

[AntiochusIII]

how the hell do you rape a 12 week old baby?

why the hell would you rape a 12 week old baby?

Sadly, nobody knows.

The crime is committed; it must be punished properly. In this circumstance, five years is a huge mistake from the judge. Even if retribution and deterrent -- not to mention one's, including my, rage at such acts of horror; why the **** would some ***** rape a baby? -- is not counted into the decision, the woman has proven, like the man, to be of an extreme danger to the individuals within society. They should be locked in for life.

Not shocking, I`m afraid. This happens at all ages, and it`s probably a hell lot of equally ugly cases not discovered.

Perhaps, but what is the point of those crimes? No crimes of greed, of survival, or insanity fits with this particular case.

Horrid.

Sounds like a huge double standard to me.

I won't dare to judge completely until the case has become clear, even though I don't want to pursue the details of this horrid crime any further; but still, I have to agree with you. She is perfectly responsible and must be properly judged before the law.