Medieval2 ~:cheers:

[King of the dutch]

JC i really don't understand you people. Its one big 'well CA prolly won't do that or this. meh they're stupid:

quote: The problem is that CA will misunderstand this data,
How the hell do you know?
quote:If you want to make a medieval warfare game, starting in 1080 and ending in 1530 makes no sense. Because that would mean half your game isn't Medieval, but Early Modern.
BS and you know it youreself

quote: I wonder how they'll deal this time with Crusades, the Bizantium decadence, the Otoman rise, the Iberian Reconquista, the Italian labyrinth, the Pope-Emperor conflicts, the post-Viking states, the Hanseatic commerce, the forming of Eastern powers, the arrival of the Age of Discoveries -giving Spain and Portugal huge resources towards the end of the timeline- etc. Too complex and challenging, if they really want to make a difference with Medieval 1, more than simply adapting it to a new engine -with a probable loss of number of factions and game depth.
Very simple: as goals like they did in part 1. Worked perfect you know.
Quote: Plus, I'd doubt they would be able to modern the rise of cities and decline of the feudal system correctly within the limits of the RTW engine. If they would even bother with that at all, of course.
Yeah why would they bother with anything. They are just a moneymilking machine out to get you're hardearned dollars for a crap game while they're laughing at you. Newsflash: i said it before you are not the market.
How in M:TW did they depict the rise of cities? Never heard anybody about it. Could be very simple though. Larger upgrades from a certain date in certain areas. See?

First of all how many games are out there that offer this depth (which you people complain is shallow) at all. It's fun to marry out you're daughters. You can rig papalelections. It's wicked. The time frame is a bit odd but saying that half the game is in the early modern period is as nonsecal and you know it yourself. EM era has started just 30 years before. I find some of you to behave like spoiled little brats who don't get the exact, correct historical game and start crying. In fact already debating how wack you're christmas present is gonna be. If you find that why do you play R:TW? Why did you bother with any Total War game. Fact is the TW series deliver gameplay that's nowhere to be found but now you're used to that, it's not good enough. Read the website again. It's about immense epic battles. Not about all you're reforms and specific little details happening on the exact date.
I never ever heard anyone complainng tha M:TW lacked anything on the history front. How come? You apparantly feel cheated with R:TW. Well then go play something else.
This is disgusting.

Everyone his/her own opinion though

kotd