I'm not saying you need to learn more before starting a discussion or debate. I'm saying you should learn more before you start making sweeping, bold, confident assertions, as you did. Examples include calling the Old Testament a bunch of "dumb stories," claiming that people in ancient (pre-scientific) times were "really dumb," and the claims I refuted in my first post.Originally Posted by Just A Girl
Unfortunately you continue to do it with this post.
For example, you continue to claim that the Bible says the earth is 6K years old. I challenged you to prove this, since I know it to be false. However, you continue to make the claim, even though you will never be able to demonstrate it.
Also, you claim that Jesus "wouldn't have had any better idea than you or I" about the Old Testament. Once again you make a confident claim without knowledge of the facts: if you had learned about Jewish culture during the life of Jesus - especially about what it meant to be a "rabbi" - or even read some of the early chapters in the gospels, you would never have made this claim. The depth of knowledge Jesus and other rabbis would have had about the O.T. is greater than you or I will ever fathom.
Finally, the use of metaphor, imagery, and other literary devices in the Bible does not originate with Jesus. It is prevalent throughout the entire writing - the prophets, the history, the poetry and wisdom books.
Once again, I'm not saying you can't participate in discussions on these topics. I'm saying you should come to ask questions and to learn, not to put your "know-it-all" ignorance on display. BTW, that's what I do all the time; like I said, I am not "learned" by any stretch of the imagination. Do you remember why Socrates considered himself the wisest man in Athens?
Because of all the philosophers there, he alone knew that he knew nothing.
Bookmarks