Attalus’s story
What price victory? We are conquerors, the victors. But was it worth it? Ach, don’t listen to me. I’m an old man, all spent now. I’ve had my fill of battle. I saw it first under Romulus Sertorius. What, you don’t know that name? I’m not surprised. You could say he saved the Empire, defeating the Sarmatian horde in Italy and leading to their people becoming loyal citizens of Rome. You might have noticed their auxiliaries play an increasingly large role in our victories? But no, you probably won’t have heard of Sertorius, as no sooner had he saved the Empire, than he was abandoned by it - suspected of disloyalty, he was stripped of his armies and sent away on some minor governorship in Gaul. I should have learnt from that, perhaps.
But no, I was young and the young often do not learn the most important lessons life teaches. I then served under Rufinus Victor. Now there was a fighter - rivalled our great Emperor in his triumphs. So, yes, I had seen enough war. But in the year of our Lord, 445, I felt the call of battle stir within me once more. As Count of the Saxon Shore, I had worked hard to restore loyalty to the Empire in Londinium and Ebacurum. But all the while, the Celts had been massing north of Hadrian’s wall. It was time for a punitive expedition - to smash their field armies, burn down their camps and then return south.
Our first encounter was a slaughter. At the end of the battle, we counted 472 Celts dead for the loss of only four of our men. So we pressed north, besieging the huge Celt city of Dal Raida in the winter. In response, the Celts gathered an army of 1500 men from the countryside and marched to relieve the city. The garrison of 300 sallied out to join them.
The Celtish army was an impressive sight and I confess I was apprehensive. Most of the enemy army was composed of Gallowglass, fierce northern warriors not unlike the Saxons. The Celts were short of cavalry though, sending a troop onto our right to await a moment to charge in from the flank. Such a threat was intolerable, but luckily the cavalry had come far in advance of the main body of enemy infantry. Consequently, our Sarmatians were able to smash the Celtish horse before the battle proper began.
445 AD outside Dal Raida: as the main Celt line of battle approaches, the Romans neutralise an early threat to their flank.
We had deployed on a hill, with both flanks refused. The Celts strung their relief army out in a long line that threatened a double envelopment.
The calm before the storm…the Celt relief army approaches
But the Celts were too thinly stretched and their lack of armour told as they struggled up the hill under the hail of first our arrows and then our javelins. Their centre appeared to dissolve under our fire. Their flanks escaped most of the missiles, but crumpled under frontal attacks from our infantry combined with rear charges by our horse.
Attalus smashes the right of the Celt relief army. Their second line - the garrison - can be seen approaching on their left.
With the relief army falling back in disarray, some of our infantry pursued the retreating enemy down the hill. This was unfortunate, as they ran into the Dal Raida garrison, advancing on our right. For a moment, it was tense, especially when a band of painted giants appeared to support the Celt gallowglass.
The left of the Celt battle line - fresh troops from the garrison counter-attack the Romans pursuing the relief army.
”The Hounds of Culann”, I believe those painted giants are called. Fortunately, we spotted the threat in advance and our archers concentrated their fire on the giants, with our Sarmatian auxiliaries riding the remnants down in a charge into their rear.
With the relief army in retreat, the sallying Celt garrison are crushed by the Romans.
The enemy were utterly defeated. The Celts lost 1800 men - we lost only one hundred. We then took the city of Dal Raida and razed it to the ground. Our men slaughtered 19000 unarmed men, women and children. What price victory, huh?
But that was not the worst off it. A few rebellious officers demanded we settle in Dal Raida and Romanise it. The Emperor had strictly forbade such settlements, so I refused. We marched further north and east, hunting down the remaining Celt armies and indeed a large Saxon force. But in my absence, the rebel officers broke away and raised a army of 2300 peasants to claim the town. I returned to besiege the town, not meaning to storm it but merely to pass it by and return south.
While Attalus hunts down the remaining opposition, a rebellion breaks out in what is left of Dal Raida.
However, when the Imperial Secretariat heard of the rebellion at Dal Raida, they demanded I crush it. I was forbidden to return south before the town had yet again been stormed and put to the sword. The slaughter of fellow Romans sickened me.
The Roman response is brutal.
I now believe our action was wrong. Upon taking Dal Raida from the Celts we should have occupied it and brought to it the benefits of Roman civilisation. The rebels were right. Our mission is to bring light to the world. Hiding behind walls and frontiers will only ossify us and lead to decay. If the Empire is to endure, it must not be content with historical borders and re-unification. For expressing these doubts, I was stripped of my offices. Like my first general, Romulous Sertorius, I was pensioned off to be governor of some insignificant Gaulish province. So be it. But I notice now that the Emperor’s legions are claiming the land of the Allemanni, the Franks, the Saxons and the Lombards. The old frontier has been crossed; the rules of the game broken. Who knows what the future will bring?
Bookmarks