A very funny take on the President's State of the Union discussion of cloning and embryonic resedarch. As the article states, Dr. Moreau will leave the country in rage.
A very funny take on the President's State of the Union discussion of cloning and embryonic resedarch. As the article states, Dr. Moreau will leave the country in rage.
No, it was pretty much what I thought it was- splicing human genes into animals for testing purposes.Originally Posted by article
So what scientists have been doing is inserting human genes into mice, to produce similar genetic overdoses in their development. As I reported before, there have been partial insertions, but now a team of researchers has inserted a complete human chromosome 21 into mouse embryonic stem cells
"Don't believe everything you read online."
-Abraham Lincoln
Well, that does it, Xihaou. No more Beastmaster for you! And I stronly suggest you rid yourself of any Animal Man comics you may have laying about.
Good. I've always despised those freaks.
Crazed Rabbit
![]()
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
I would totally support human/animal splicing if it meant I could get a bigger penis or super-speed or something
Baby Quit Your Cryin' Put Your Clown Britches On!!!
What? Don't you know that all you have to do is reply to the e-mail in your inbox and your bigger penis is only minutes away?
"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith
Scientists have in the past spliced human genes into bacteria so that these bacteria were to produce insulin.
Bush really does hate diabetics.
Much good can come from cloning and genetical research, but even more bad things. It's difficult to formulate a law that effectively allows the good parts and prohibits the dangerous parts. As long as that obstacle remains it IMO seems logical to prohibit the whole thing. Just imagine how the value of human life would decrease if it was possible to clone and genetically modify people. Already plastic surgery and makeup has dangerous effects to self-esteem, indentity and respect of life. It's not just a myth that some scientists are working on cloning actual human beings and perform similar very unethical and dangerous things. So while the decision might be caused by religious values and way of thinking, there's scientific and humanistic argumentation for the decision.
Under construction...
"In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore
Bookmarks